The Killing of Kayla

Dr. William Pierce



To: National Alliance (
American Dissident Voices Broadcast of March 11, 2000

American Dissident Voices Broadcast of March 11, 2000

The Killing of Kayla
by Dr. William Pierce

A number of listeners have told me that I really must comment on the
series of horrible murders of White people by Blacks during the past two
weeks. My initial response to these suggestions was negative. It is not
the purpose of these American Dissident Voices broadcasts to tell
listeners what they already know. If the Jewish media report something
well enough for people to get the essential facts of what happened, then
I'm inclined to leave it alone.

In the case of these recent race murders, however, it is not entirely
clear that the facts were presented adequately. Many people asked me
whether or not the carjacker who dragged the six-year-old White boy to
his death in Independence, Missouri, on February 22 is Black. They
assumed that he is Black, because the murder occurred during a
carjacking, which is an almost exclusively Black crime, and also because
the murderer wasn't shown on television. Americans have learned from
experience that when the media refuse to show them the face of a
criminal, it usually is because he is not White. There were many
pictures of the victim, little Jake Robel, on television, but none of
his murderer.

Well, of course, the assumption was correct. Although most of the
national media managed to avoid revealing the race of the murderer,
several local newspapers in Missouri carried pictures of him. He was
34-year-old Kim Davis, of Kansas City, a Black criminal who looked as if
he'd just been pulled down from a tree in Africa. He was hanging around
a sandwich shop parking lot in Independence waiting for an opportunity
to steal a car. When little Jake's mother drove up and got out of her
car, leaving her six-year-old son in the back seat, the Black seized the
chance. He shoved Jake out onto the pavement but left the White child
entangled in his seatbelt. As the Black drove off, Jake's mother was
trying frantically to free her son from his seatbelt and was screaming at
the Black to stop, but he ignored her and roared out of the parking lot
behind the wheel of her car, with the child bouncing and scraping along
the pavement. He dragged the child for more than four miles, at speeds
up to 80 miles an hour, before White drivers were able to block the
stolen car, pull the Black out, tie him up, and sit on him until the
police arrived. Of course, it was far too late to do anything for the
child, except cover his torn body with a blanket.

Police, of course, marked and photographed spots along the route of the
dragging where there were pools of little Jake's blood and pieces of his
flesh, so that the photographs could be used later as evidence in the
Black's trial. Do you remember when three young White men dragged a
convicted Black criminal to his death in Jasper, Texas, two years ago?
I'm sure that you do, because the media bosses made it a point not to
let you forget. Over and over and over again we saw on our television
screens those little circles the police had marked along the road where
they had found some of the victim's blood. Now, I will promise you that
you never will see the spots the police in Missouri marked where little
Jake Robel's blood was found. Those bloody spots won't be shown, nor
will the Black murderer's face be shown, because the media bosses want
you to forget about the murder of little Jake Robel as quickly as

At least, little Jake's dragging received some news coverage for a day
or two. That's more than two White women who were dragged to their
deaths in carjackings got. Just a week earlier, on February 14,
41-year-old Sandra Roberts was dragged to death in Kansas City. I'll bet
you haven't heard a word about that, and you won't hear about it, for
the usual reason. Then there was the murder of Patricia Stansfield in
August 1998.  The 46-year-old White woman was dragged two miles to her
death along a road in Streator, Illinois, by a Black who was stealing
her car. After the Black killer, Christopher Coleman, had dragged
Patricia for two miles while she screamed for mercy, he eventually
stopped, cut her dead body loose, and left her in a roadside ditch
before continuing on with her car. And if you didn't hear about this
killing from me, you didn't hear about it. The media bosses imposed a
total news embargo on the Black-on-White Stansfield dragging, which
occurred just after the White-on-Black dragging in Jasper, Texas. They
didn't want news about Patricia Stansfield's murder to detract from
their massive publicity about the Jasper dragging.

The murder of little Kayla Rolland in Michigan last week received more
news coverage than the dragging of Jake Robel, but there was the usual
media reluctance to let us know that the killer who shot the
six-year-old White girl to death in her first-grade classroom was Black.
Most television viewers had to infer that he was Black by learning from
news reports that he had been living in a crack house and that he had
used a pistol which had been stolen from a local business by one of his
adult relatives. If we were lucky we caught a brief glimpse of one of
his very Black relatives being led into a courtroom in chains, although
we never got to see the killer himself. If we were diligent readers of
news reports on the Internet we might have learned that he already had
been suspended from school three times-in the first grade-once for
stabbing a classmate. We might also learn that he had attacked little
Kayla on the school playground the day before, and that when he pulled
out a pistol and shot her in the neck he told her, "I hate you." None of
the news reports that I was able to find, however, came right out and
said that he was Black and habitually acted in a way so many other young
Blacks do in racially integrated schools, where they cause problems far
out of proportion to their numbers. None of the news commentators asked
why something hadn't been done to protect little Kayla from this
juvenile monster with a record of assaults after his display of
hostility and aggression against her the day before. They seemed much
more concerned with explaining away the killer's behavior and treating
him as a victim of society.

About the only recent Black-on-White killings which have received news
coverage which even mentioned the racial element were the murders of
three White men in Pittsburgh last week by a Black killer who became
enraged when a White repair crew failed to repair the door on his
subsidized apartment fast enough to suit him and who told everyone who
would listen that he hated Whites and wanted to kill all White people.
It was pretty hard for the media to keep the racial angle out of that
story. I have a prediction to make, however: the media will let this
story die a lot quicker than they let die a couple of other stories
about racial killings which come to mind: the story of Buford Furrow,
for example, who wounded several Jews and killed one Filipino in Los
Angeles last year, or the story of Benjamin Smith, who killed one Korean
and one Black in Illinois.

In fact, the Furrow and Smith stories really haven't been allowed to die
yet. They remain grist for Hollywood's White-guilt mill. And I'm sure
that you're familiar with the technique used by the media bosses  for
keeping such stories alive. They use the old Watergate technique, the
Chinese water-drop technique, in which every day they breathlessly
dribble out some new tidbit connected with the story, or if they don't
have any new tidbit, they just rehash all of the old tidbits. One way or
another they keep the story in the public consciousness long enough for
it to sink in. After the story leaves the front pages, they remind the
public about it with television documentaries every month or so. In the
past year there already have been several television specials featuring
Buford Furrow and Benjamin Smith. I'm quite sure that during the next
couple of years we'll see dozens more television specials based on the
escapades of Furrow and Smith..

I'll also predict that we won't see any television specials about last
week's murder of three White men in Pittsburgh by a hate-crazed Black
killer-not even one--because they want us to forget about that as
quickly as possible. We also will not see Mr. Clinton coming on
television and giving us all a little sermon about hate in connection
with last week's Pittsburgh murders, the way he did in connection with
both the Furrow and Smith incidents. What we did get to see on
television after the murder of little Kayla Rolland, however, was Mr.
Clinton pushing hard for more gun control laws-especially a law
requiring trigger locks on guns in order to keep kids from using them.
Are we supposed to believe that such a law would have kept six-year-old
Kayla from being murdered by her Black classmate? Are we supposed to
believe that Black crack dealers will run out and buy trigger locks for
all their guns if Mr. Clinton and his anti-gun backers succeed in having
such a law passed? What we need is minority control, not gun control.

And that brings us to the subject I really want to talk about today. You
know, I could go on and on about Black-on-White crime and the reluctance
of the controlled news media to report it, because it doesn't fit their
agenda of making White Americans feel guilty, of keeping White Americans
morally disarmed and off balance. I mentioned three terrible crimes
against White people which occurred within the past two and a half
weeks, but these Black-on-White crimes are not the point. In a sense
they aren't even important. In a sense I welcome such crimes. I welcome
them because they remind us of a much bigger problem we have, and that
is the destruction of our society, the destruction of our civilization,
the destruction of our race by those who have deliberately brought about
the conditions in America where six-year-old White girls are murdered in
their first-grade classrooms by subhuman animals; conditions where White
women and children are dragged to their deaths by subhuman animals bent
on stealing a car with total disregard for the lives of anyone who gets
in their way; conditions where a subhuman animal flies into a rage
because White workers aren't fast enough in repairing the door to his
rent-subsidized apartment which he himself kicked in when he lost his
key and then begins murdering White people, whom he blames for all his
own inadequacies.

What's important is that these conditions have been imposed on us
deliberately, and we're all obliged to live under them, and they're
getting worse, and eventually they will destroy our people. That's
what's important. And if it takes the shooting of little Kayla Rolland
in her classroom in Michigan to make us think about that, then little
Kayla died for a good cause. If it takes the dragging to death of little
Jake Robel along a highway in Missouri to distract us from our ball
games for a few minutes and give just a few of us a chance to see the
big picture, then it is worth it.

I know that sounds terrible and heartless to people who are
constitutionally incapable of seeing the big picture, to people who are
incapable of thinking about anything except in individual and personal
terms. All they can think about is poor little Kayla, poor little Jake,
the poor fellows who were murdered by a hate-crazed Black in Pittsburgh.
What we must think about instead of what happened to little Kayla is
that other little White girls like Kayla all over America, in most of
the schools in America, are exposed every day to Blacks like the one who
murdered Kayla; that evil people in Washington and Hollywood and New
York have deliberately imposed on our country policies which make it
impossible for little White girls like Kayla to escape being exposed to

Of course, most little White girls like Kayla don't get shot to death by
six-year-old primates who have been declared equals and given seats in
their classrooms by evil men in Washington who know better. Many more
are raped than are shot. Even more are lured into the hip-hop
life-style, into the jungle culture of rap and filth and drugs promoted
by the Hollywood and new York Jews who control the entertainment media
to which millions of little White girls like Kayla become addicted,
because it is fashionable to be addicted. And 30 or 40 years from now
all little White girls like Kayla-every little White girl in
America--will be obliged to live in a society in which there is no
protection at all because Whites will be a minority: a society in which
interracial marriage will be the norm, encouraged by Hollywood even more
than it is today. That's what the Jews of Hollywood and New York and the
treacherous politicians of Washington who serve them are planning for
America. That's why they always overemphasize the rare White-on-Black
crime stories and minimize the Black-on-White crime stories. And that's
why any incident, no matter how horrible or painful, which makes us
think about the future, which alerts us to what is in store for us,
should be welcome.

When I see the Hollywood Jews presenting an interracial couple on
television in an attempt to persuade young White girls that dating
Blacks is fashionable and is something they ought to try themselves, I'm
angrier than when I read about the murder of a little White girl by a
Black classmate. In the long run it's the interracial sex which is more
destructive. And it is the evil men who have deliberately imposed on
America the policies which brought about little Kayla's murder who are
more reprehensible, more deserving of hanging, than the juvenile primate
who shot her.

As early as the 1920s the Jews of America were openly and aggressively
promoting their program for multiculturalizing us, for breaking up our
homogeneous White society and making us instead into a cosmopolitan hash
of various racial minorities which they could more easily penetrate and
control. I said "as early as the 1920s"; actually, this behavior on the
part of the Jews of working to destroy the solidarity and homogeneity of
a society they intend to penetrate and control is thousands of years
old. It's in their genes. But in America by the 1920s it was open and
very obvious. America was at that time a mixture of Celtic, Germanic,
Slavic, and Mediterranean peoples, part Protestant and part Catholic,
but all Europeans, all Whites. The freed Black slaves and their
descendants had their own separate society. The Indians lived on
reservations. It was a White country, and nearly everyone but the Jews
assumed it would stay that way. We wanted it to stay that way.

Most of our people never dreamed that anyone would want to force White
Americans to accept their former African slaves as "equals" and
encourage our daughters to bed down with these "equals." We never
dreamed that anyone was scheming to change our immigration laws so that
they could block the flow of our people from Europe and instead  bring
in millions of Chinese and Vietnamese and Pakistanis and Haitians and
Mexican mestizos and Soviet Jews and use them to destroy our cities and
our neighborhoods and our schools and organize them into voting blocks
for the purpose of disempowering and dispossessing us. We didn't dream
that such a thing could happen or that anyone would want it to happen.

We knew that Jews usually were up to no good, and we had signs at the
doors of many of our better hotels and restaurants and business
establishments: "No Jews Admitted." But most of us never dreamed that
this clever but despicable minority would succeed in turning our society
upside down, in capturing control of our government, in destroying our
institutions, in suppressing our traditions and our values and our
standards of behavior, and in making a multicultural pigsty of our
country. We never dreamed that the day would come when White parents
would be forced by law to send their six-year-old daughters to school
with little Black monsters descended from their African slaves. And of
course, in the 1920s we never dreamed of television and of the
destructive power of a Jew-controlled Hollywood.

To be sure, some of our people did try to warn us. In the 1920s the Iron
Curtain of Political Correctness had not yet descended on our
universities, and many historians, biologists, anthropologists, and
other scholars were not afraid to write frankly about racial matters and
Jewish matters. Unfortunately, it was all done very politely, in a very
gentlemanly manner, and the average White voter never looked up from his
funny papers. The Jews, on the other hand, were organizing and
propagandizing at all levels, with 3000 years of practice behind them.
They were recruiting the more venal and unscrupulous elements among the
Christian clergy; the most resentful, neurotic, and ambitious elements
among the academics; the most empty-headed and trendy of the would-be
"intellectuals." They infiltrated our universities and took over whole
departments. They bought our politicians by the hundreds. And of course,
they were buying up the mass media as fast as they could elbow their
Gentile competitors out of the way.

The "culture war" of the 1920s and 1930s was short and decisive. We
never even took our gloves off, and they whipped us good. Then they were
able to lie us into the Second World War, and after that our goose was
cooked. They used the dislocations associated with the war to introduce
far-reaching changes into our society, and within 15 years after the war
they had our whole society in turmoil. And today White children and
White women are dragged to death behind cars being stolen by Blacks, and
the media keep it hushed up while saturating us with images of a few
Whites committing crimes against non-Whites. And six-year-old White
girls are murdered in their classrooms by little Black monsters who are
treated as victims of a White-racist society.

And all the while they hammer into us day and night with their media the
defeatist notion that the multiculturalism they have imposed on us is
here to stay, that there's nothing we can do about it, and so we'd
better get used to it. They believe that they've got us beaten down to
the point now where nothing will make us rebel.

Well, listen Jewboys! You're dead wrong. Just let a few more of our
women and children get butchered by your multicultural pets, and you'll
see what we can do about it. The war isn't over, and this time we'll
fight with our gloves off. Payback day is coming. We'll start with the
traitors among our own people, with the politicians and the journalists.
But we will get around to you. Believe me, we will!


The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
It is distributed by e-mail each Saturday to subscribers of ADVlist.

To subscribe to ADVlist, send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" as the subject of the message to:

For more information about National Vanguard Books or the
National Alliance see our web site at or

==> The National Alliance has a strict anti-spamming policy.  This 
information is intended for interested parties only and is not to be 
indiscriminately distributed via mass e-mailing or newsgroup posting.

To contact us, write to:
     National Vanguard Books
     Attention:  ADVlist
     P.O. Box 330
     Hillsboro, WV  24946

or e-mail: please tell us if we can post your
comments and if so whether you want your name or e-mail address

-->  TO BE REMOVED from ADVlist, send an e-mail message to:  which has "unsubscribe" as the subject of the

(c) 2000 National Vanguard Books



Over to Martin Lindstedt's Church&State Theocracy WWW page
Back to Patrick Henry On-Line
Back to The Thought 4 The Day
Back to Stuff I Wish I Wrote -- But Didn't