Assassination Politics v. RAF Cell

.

.


Somebody asked:

>Spooner wrote:
>
>	The greatest of all crimes are the wars that are carried
>        on by governments, to plunder, enslave, and destroy mankind.
>
>        The next greatest crimes committed in the world are equally
>        prompted by avarice and ambition; and are committed, not on
>        sudden passion, but by men of calculation, who keep their
>        heads cool and clear, and who have no thought whatever of
>        going to prison for them. They are committed, not so much
>        by men who violate the laws, as by men who, either by them-
>        selves or by their instruments, *make* the laws; by men who
>        have combined to usurp arbitrary power, and to maintain it
>        by force and fraud, and whose purpose in usurping and
>        maintaining it is by unjust and unequal *legislation*,
>        to secure to themselves such advantages and monopolies
>        as will enable them to control and extort the labor and
>        properties of other men, and thus impoverish them, in
>        order to minister to their own wealth and aggrandizement.
>        The robberies and wrongs thus committed by these men, in
>        conformity with the laws---that is, *their_own_laws*---
>        are as mountains to molehills, compared with the crimes
>        committed by all other criminals, in violation of the 
>	laws. --Lysander Spooner, "Vices Are Not Crimes" (1875)
>        (http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/6181/vices.html)

.

OK, first let me agree with all of the above which Spooner has just written. The worst elements of the criminal class are the ruling regime criminals. And, as I have written myself many times before, it is a waste of time and utter foolishness to love and worship the criminal regime's supposed foundational support, namely what a pack of traitors did to overthrow the American Revolution to set up their own corrupt oligarchy.

As a Resistance officer, I have through my writings in my various electronic publications tried to dispel the foolishness inherent in the former [former because altogether irrelevant today] militia movement with its fixation on somehow restoring a CONstitutional order which never really existed except in the minds of these fools. The end result has usually been futile. Regardless of what is said, a sizable majority of the so-called patriots will flock back to the CONstitutional golden calf for a few more witless lopings around their duly-beloved mental Molech, hoping that a few more of their fellow worshippers will slung into the fiery gullet, yowling if it happens to be them.

A love of government is incompatible with patriotism. And a CONstitutional form of government as it is today is an especial love of all the worst elements of government, as it is the absolute negation of any form of responsibility for the absolute power it grants to corrupt ruling oligarchs.
In fact, if you wish to see how well a nation is being governed, look not at the pretend legitimizing force, be it a CONstitution, criminal regimeist pretend legis-treason, divine right of kings, or a dicktatorship of the proletariat, but rather at the character of the overall people living in that civilization. As Lothrup Stoddard put it in his 1922 classic, "The Revolt AGAINST Civilization,": "We can prattle on and on about the meanings of our laws, even our holy scriptures themselves, but the guiding force of all civilizations has been in the quality of the bloodlines of the men involved."

So as of yet my efforts have met with failure -- and success. The vast majority of the people who have come across my writings simply blow them off. But yet I never intended to reach such an audience. The value of the Internet is that it costs no more to talk or write to 10,000 people as it does one or two. Thus my steady sift, sift, sifting in search of an audience has resulted in my finding of the audience of which I sought. Granted, some of them are doubtless fedrule agents seeking to see what that savage renegade Martin Lindstedt is advocating next, be it first-strike biological warfare against New York or the District of Corruption, or merely low-level sedition. Others are fedrule infilltraitors who I have kicked before and will doubtless kick again, waiting to see what I've said about them this time. I do have a justified reputation for vengeful malevolence. But yet, there are doubtless quite a few in that remaining audience, wishing to know my 'take' on a situation because I take pains to have a logical reason behind my thinking.

But granted that Spooner was absolutely correct concerning the CONstitution, the question then becomes, "What are we going to do about it?" And in Spooner's day (1870) the question as to what should we do about a criminal fedrule regime had been settled recently by a bloody civil war, which at the time had claimed the lives of more Americans in numbers both absolute and proportional than any other war up until the time of this current civil war. The question as to the absolute power of fedrule criminal rule was settled for that place and time. The fedrule criminal regime could do whatever it wanted, subject of course to the possibilities of a new revolt.

But yet the CONstitution, flawed as it was, was largely irrelevant when faced with the inherent strength of the people. Eventually the entire purpose of the CONstitution, ensuring an orderly trans-continental colonization went on and was largely fulfilled. And with the end of the frontier, came the rulership of its people and the looting, devastation and destruction of its civilization by the ruling regime criminals, with the acquiescence of its increasingly corrupt population.

.

>Although it's old news on the net, I just came across Jim Bell's 
>"Assassination Politics" last week.  Bell's theory, without a doubt, 
>is the most profound piece of writing I've ever had the pleasure 
>to read concerning ways to finally rid the world of the current
>criminal regime Spooner alludes to above.  (see also, Spooner's 
>"No Treason" (http://www.math.ku.dk/~buhl/Library/Classics.html))  
>[BTW, is there a URL "Not Worth the Paper it Was Printed On" Martin?]

.

[In Modern Militiaman Issue #4, which can be found at URL: http://www.mo-net.com/~mlindste/mmmisu4.html#mm410 ]

.


>Jim Bell's 16,000 word theorem on "Assassination Politics" and
>"Digitaliberty" is *utterly_brilliant* in its deepth and scope.  
>Here are two pages that have posted it in it's entirety:
>
>	http://jya.com/ap.htm
>	http://www.zolatimes.com/v2.26/jimbell.htm 
>
>Bell has offered a novel alternative which might, once and for all, 
>rid the world of those knaves and miscreants who hide behind color 
>of law and who twist it for use in ministering to their own power, 
>wealth and aggrandizement in order to plunder, rape and murder 
>mankind as often as they find it in their interest or pleasure to 
>do so; and to brand anyone who disputes their pretended authority, 
>or who resist their colorable demands as: "criminals", "cultists", 
>"extremists", "enemies of the 'people'", and "traitors", in order 
>to justify murdering them (or looting their property and locking 
>them in a cage, as the Internal Revenue Stealers have done with 
>Bell, see (http://jya.com/jdbfiles.htm) for time-table relating 
>what happend between Bell and the IRS from 3 April, 1997 to present).

.

And I disagree with Bell in that while the writing is good, and it seems possible, it is not practicable.

For example: Bell is now in jail. Nobody has been assassinated by participating in an Internet lottery as to when the particular regime criminal was assassinated.

Whereas take Timothy McVeigh. Even though his cell was compromised by the FiBbIes, taking into account that McVeigh is possibly a manchurian oswald, and that the FiBbIes and BATF knew full well that the OKC bombing was going down, possibly even providing the truck bomb to cover for the demolition charges on the column supports, was Timothy McVeigh effective?

For a better case in point, let's take Eric Rudolph. This man is probably a one-man Resistance Action-Force cell. Out of the blue he supposedly gets an abortion mill, killing one piggy as collateral damage. Then he disappears, is unsuccessfully hunted, and is doubtless hiding somewhere in a Resistance safehouse.

.

So which is more effective? Jim Bell with his theoretical Internet lottery where the winner of electronic cash is the person who guesses closest to when a particular regime criminal actually dies? Or Timothy McVeigh, who ran an inept 'leaderless resistance' action force cell which was penetrated so badly by the criminal regime that perhaps they were the actual ones running it? Or, to make a better point, Eric Rudolph, who may have run a one-man cell, or maybe with one or two others providing the support?

I am not interested in brilliant theory, but rather in successful application. Cellular Resistance organization has appeared every time the peoples' opposition is faced by a criminal regime relying on a police state to save them and their positions of power. I myself am not a pioneer in this concept of 'leaderless resistance' nor is even Mr. Louis Beam, but rather a teacher of the details which define the flavor of a Resistance organized by cells for this generation. While Mr. Bell saw, correctly, that the Internet made it possible for natural-born revolutionaries to disseminate propaganda, sedition, and communications in anonymous encrypted security, this still does not change the human factors behind every Revolution, past and present. Every Resistance must generate propaganda, have secure communications, internal security, have as a political objective the overthrow of the current corrupt criminal regime, and, once successful, to secure the revolutionary bridgehead against counter-revolution by the extermination of regime criminals and their supporters. The technical factors of every Revolution are always different -- the human factors of every Revolution remain the same.

.

>I also agree with Spooner that "the greatest of all crimes are the 
>wars that are carried on by governments, to plunder, enslave, and 
>destroy mankind." The RAF cells holy war against the criminal regime 
>and the implementation Bell's theory both focus on similar problems; 
>but Jim Bell's theory takes a different approach as to how armed 
>resistance should be carried out, and how the defeat of the criminal 
>regime might most effectively occur. It is a theory that would bypass 
>the possibility that those who masquerade around as 'government' 
>(so-called) could use such resistance as an excuse to commit "the 
>greatest of all crimes": "wars that are carried on by governments, 
>to plunder, enslave, and destroy mankind" in 'defense' the resistance. 

.

Do you really believe criminal regimeist excuses and pretentions any more than I do? Doubtful? Does the masses? Probably, possibly not. Yet the underlying dialogue is well understood. It is the use of violence to obtain political objectives which is being done. The criminal regime uses violence and terror to attain its political objectives of rulership over the masses. What do you think they use 'law enforcement' officers for, if not to enforce by terror or the threat of violence their will upon the masses or the individual?

So the criminal regime is based upon the use of terror, a terror which is understood. The unorganized Resistance uses terror to in turn send a message to the criminal regime and the masses. Waco was avenged by OKC (although not really because it was the fedrule regime which in effect committed the bombing, much like they did with the World Trade Center and the recent bombings in Africa.) Eric Rudolph sent the message that abortion mills might well be under attack as well.

To search for a 'moral message' to this is becoming increasingly impossible, if not irrelevant. In a world filled with injustice and weapons of mass destruction, such moral messages cannot be derived out of the mindless activity of amoral criminal regimeists and amoral masses. Given the reality of death and destruction exchanged between a powerful criminal regime and from out of the ranks of the masses, trying to make things stop -- far too late -- would be the only reason to try to untangle that Gordian knot. Since Gordian knots are usually best unraveled by having the sword slice through the knot, that will be the procedure eventually used to settle the matter. The criminal regime will be overthrown, and regime criminals and their families will be made to bear the full weight of guilt and responsibility before being exterminated absolutely. Then both the injustices, social conflicts, and the resulting violence will be settled absolutely.

.

>To me, Bells theory seems like it might prove more effective then 
>the RAF cell resistance since it could bypass 'war' as the primary 
>means of armed resistance -- something that the RAF's actions might 
>serve to provoke and escalate, and something the criminal regime 
>might use to mask further usuraptions; whereas Jim Bell's approach 
>leaves the criminal regime impotent and powerless in this regard. 
>They would have no way to effectively defend against it. In fact,
>the more they used force to carry out crimes and usurpations in the
>name of defending against it, the quicker they would dig their own 
>grave, and the more powerful the technique would become.
.

Let's look at Jim Bell's approach: What it boils down to is an anonymous Internet lottery using e-cash to pay off the anonymous person who wins a lottery based upon the best guess as to when a particular regime criminal dies. The person who would win the lottery would be presumably the person who assassinates the particular regime criminal, as being in the best position to know when the regime criminal would die since he has first-hand involvement in skewing his bet.

This approach is not yet, or perhaps ever usable.

First of all, the very concept of electronic cash depends on someone or something trustworthy keeping track of who has it. Electronic cash would be the equivalent of electronic counterfeiting if just about anyone could claim to have a million without any account as to how they got it. If everyone could claim to have a heap of e-cash, and it was granted, then the e-cash would be as worthless as if I printed up a million-dollar monopoly bill and said it was real money. There has to be something tangible to back up any currency -- if nothing else at least a swarm of police, tax-collectors, and secret service agents claiming that the fiat currency has value.

So in order to have some validity to a currency which has no backing, a measure of anonyminity will have to be sacrificed. And that certainly dooms an assassination lottery with the results paid off in e-cash.

.

Secondly, does anyone really think that a vengeful criminal regime which has seen one of its regime criminals terminated is going to allow an 'assassination lottery' to give out its winnings without doing anything about it? Doubtful. Professional assassins want both valid money and getting away to spend it. So there goes the professionals, allowing only for amateurs to do this -- people who if they do kill criminal regimeists would have done it for free given opportunity.

(This is why you don't see the First Criminal wandering about the countryside looking for a blowjob, but rather relying on his criminal regime enforcement goons to procure sluts for him. As it was in Arkansas, so it is in the District of Corruption. Most polytickians are increasingly looking to get security from the masses, which could harbor all manner of amateur assassins lacking funds or inclination to journey to the District of Corruption to fire off a few rounds at the White (whore)House or CONgress.)

.

Thirdly, there really was no popular accepatance and can be no acceptance of Jim Bell's plan. To the vast majority of the masses, playing in an 'assassination lottery' (which would give much-needed cover to for the professional assassin to harvest regime criminals) is unthinkable. Jim Bell's plan, even if practical, would always be condemned by the criminal regimeists, who like all criminals think that they never deserve retribution for their crimes. And the masses will always back up the regime criminals. Thus Jim Bell's plan not only was ineffective in a Revolutionary sense, but politically suspect as well.

No wonder Jim Bell was locked up, without a demurral from the victims of regime criminals.

.

>I'm a bit curious as to what the Resistance Political Front's 
>opinion towards Jim Bell's "Assassination Politics" theorem is?
.

Contrast if you will the attitude of Resistance Action Force cells.

99 out of 100 Resistance cells are nothing but survival cells. It is well understood that there shall be a great die-off of probably close to 90% at least of the masses given the inevitable collapse of the current criminal regime. The deaths shall be concentrated among the very young, old, and people who live in the big cities.

So given that reality, the vast majority of Resistance Action Force Cells are founded among the white rural element for the purpose of survival for the members and their families. They are not interested in 'saving this country' from itself. Rather, they are interested from saving themselves from this country and its deserved fate.

So they have prepared for the future by stockpiling food and ammunition for their own use. They grow their own food, buy bulk grain, always bought guns and ammunition. Many in fact look forwards to getting the time of troubles over once and for all.

.

So will these people be attacking the criminal regime overtly? Not in most cases. In any case, the regime criminals likely to be offed would more than likely be the local regime criminals who have wronged them, as opposed to regime criminals in the far-off state capitol, or the District of Corruption. Their purpose is to watch and wait, without any love or respect for their local criminal regimeists. They know where these criminal regimeists live. They know their character. But in most cases, these regime criminals cannot be dealt with right away, right now.

But yet there are a few Resistance Action Force Cells which by the circumstance of the moment, or due to the felt need to "do something" do exactly that. And as the social pressure cooker heats up, as the pressure boils up, one will see more and more activity taking place. The vast overwhelming mass of it, such as Weston who shot up the CONgress-kritters lair, will be composed of the disturbed and desperate. As this process continues, as the social order continues to decay and simmer in its own juices of corruption, this will happen more and more. The criminal regime will be unable to stem the tide. As this happens, the actual Resistance cells will be able to strike undetected within growing noise levels provided by random violence against the criminal regime.

.

So the first task of the Resistance cells is to survive, as is the task of any Resistance force. No effective guerrilla force attacks unless a victory is guaranteed. An effective guerrilla/Resistance organization lets the masses react to the criminal regime, doing most of the work, while it maneuvers to pick up the pieces. Right now, because of the fact of criminal regime infilltraitors, the Resistance Action Force Cells are scattered, without a voice, without an overall plan other than dealing with matters at a local level. The job of the Resistance Political Front is to ennunciate policy, create communications and propaganda networks, and develop a political plan to dispose of any remnants of the criminal regime and criminal regimeists after the collapse. The overall Resistance must be the only disciplined force, provide the new elites necessary to do the political and social tasks necessary to finish off the remnants of the criminal regime and to refound the social order once these last predators and parasites have been eliminated from the body politic. And the Resistance will be allowed to do exactly this, because the collapse of the current social order will largely eliminated the masses of human herd element not strong enough to have survived because of their inherent defects of lacking character, strength, moral and mental toughness. Those who survive will not be criminals or cowards or thieves or degenerates, which are now allowed to live, subsidized at the cost of the productive and strong elements of the social order. Upon the collapse of the current social order, with its dygenic effects, there will be nothing to keep alive regime criminals or the criminal regime.

The Resistance makes the calculation that only a certain element is strong enough to survive the collapse. The survivors will be largely the Resistance elements or people whom the Resistance would have no problem with. The surviving criminal regimeist predator and parasites must be hunted down and exterminated with as much torment as possible in order to both make them the scapegoats and as an example to deter another collapse as far as possible. By placing the blame for the collapse which killed about 90% of the current social order on remaining regime criminals, by enacting policies of justice for the high-quality survivors, we can refound the social order with as little of the remaining sicknesses as possible, much like the re-colonization of the world by the survivors of the flood, without a need to have a long Dark Age by the inclusion in the social order by the uncivilized and the uncivilizable under-man.

.

Jim Bell bet on non-existing unrealistic agressive policy to save a corrupt social order bent on its own destruction. I am betting on an existing network of cells to pursue a realistic, largely defensive reactive policy allowing a corrupt dygenic social order to meet its fate, let it destroy itself, and then refound a social order with the self-disciplined, mentally tough and morally sound higher order of survivors. I think my scenario is by far the more realistic one.

--Martin Lindstedt
Resistance Political Front

.

Submitted Sept. 14, 1998

.

.

Back to Thought For The Day
Back to Resistance War College
Back to Patrick Henry On-Line

.