The next flag I burn will have stars and stripes!

Jim Floyd

.

.


Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 14:02:10 -0500 (CDT)
From: James Floyd (jfloyd@hiwaay.net)
Subject: The next flag I burn will have stars and stripes!


   Oh, woe is me. De judge say I gotta go to court on Good Friday?
   Well, it somehow seems appropriate, doesn't it? Me and Jesus
   never have done any good in court.

   And I too have a Peter. His name is Oscar Stilley, of Little Rock
   Ar.  This bastard gave his oath that he would stick with me to
   the end.  He quit me, Monday, four days before this first hearing.

   Alone, again, amen!

   The below may be of interest;

----------------------------------------------------------------

   to     The Honorable James H. Hancock
          U.S. District Court

         case #: 00-CV-383

   from  James Floyd
         Plaintiff


   Your Honor, I have no illusions of adequacy regarding my ability 
   to proceed with this case.  However, at this late date, I find myself 
   without an attorney.  Mr. Becraft only agreed to file the necessary 
   papers with the understanding that Mr. Stilley would be totally 
   responsible for representing me in this action.  Mr. Becraft's 
   appearance, in your court, is obligatory and he has no desire to 
   continue beyond this hearing.

   Mr. Stilley has confessed that his conduct in this case has been 
   both unprofessional and unconscionable.  In a taped conversation, 
   he asked forgiveness for  failing to perform his duties and admitted 
   that he fabricated excuses to justify his conduct.  He confessed that 
   his advice to me, given four days before this hearing, was for his 
   convenience without regard for my best interest.  He never intended 
   to come to this court.     


The Case


   In January of 1998, I organized a meeting to protest illegal 
   immigration. At this gathering I attempted to burn a Mexican flag.  
   I did not falsely assume that flag burning was/is a constitutionally 
   protected right of free speech and expression.  I listen to the first 
   reports of this decision on National Public Radio and went to the 
   library, prior to the flag burning, to verify that the Supreme Court 
   had so ruled and had reaffirmed this right.

   I acted in childish faith, believing that the Federal Court System, 
   which told me that I could burn a flag, would surely not allow the 
   City of Cullman or the State of Alabama to deny me this right through 
   subterfuge and legal maneuvers.  Am I now to be told that fifty states 
   and thousands of backwater towns and cities have arrogated to 
   themselves the power to qualify, revise or otherwise restrict the 
   exercise of this mode of free speech?

   I told everyone, in a number of TV and press interviews and with my 
   local attorney present, that I had no confidence in receiving fair 
   treatment from our city, county or state courts.  Your Honor, I am 
   painfully aware of Alabama's record of non-compliance with federal 
   law and their disregard for civil rights.  That record is abysmal 
   and any thinking person would consider them innocent of any 
   qualification as a defender of our rights.

   At no time, ever, was I told of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and the 
   possibility that the Federal Court would not hear my complaints.  It 
   is patently unfair to be told, three days before this hearing, that 
   my only chance to be heard would have been by way of a writ of 
   certiorari (?) and that only two percent of these filings are addressed 
   by the Supreme Court.

   Mr. Becraft told me that he knew you and that you would not listen to 
   my complaints.  Again, with child-like faith I am trusting that this 
   is untrue.

 As briefly as possible, these are my complaints;

   In city court the original citation was changed from "burning flags" 
   to "violation of the burn ordinance."  At my first appearance before 
   Judge H. Frank Brunner, county court, I was told that the case was 
   not about flag burning, free speech, the constitution etc. and that 
   we were to refrain from such statements. 

   Judge Brunner restated this admonition in his court, during the trial, 
   and threatened to punish my attorney if he continued to pursue this 
   line of defense.  I have attached the citation, ARJA, to this document, 
   please note that in two places it charges me with "burning flags," and 
   "burning flags at civic center."  This citation was not presented to 
   the Appeals  Court or the State Supreme Court.

   Your Honor, there is a man in your court that I do not believe will 
   lie to you about the following complaint.  Chief of Police, Kenny 
   Culpepper, is an honest man with whom I have exchanged books, had long 
   conversations and have, for a long time, considered to be a friend. 
   Ask him whether or not Judge H. Frank Brunner, spoke the following 
   words from his bench, "Floyd you are going to take this case to another 
   court, to another judge, and you might win, but you are not going to 
   win in my court."

   No, that obscene statement is not in the transcript but should be and 
   should have been presented to the other courts, because it best 
   exemplifies the heavy-handed treatment I received from this judge.

   I was, also, offended when the prosecutor, Wayne Fuller, asked the 
   perspective jurors, "Is there anybody here who thinks they can violate 
   our local laws just because we violate your civil rights?"

   These two statements, alone, speak volumes regarding the combined 
   effort of this judge and prosecutor to deny me a fair trial but there 
   is more, much more!

   I am capable of explaining the city's machinations surrounding the 
   issue of a flag burning permit.

   I am capable of debunking any charge of public endangerment, any 
   charge of bigotry or racism, and, most importantly, I am able to show 
   that from the material which finally reached the higher courts that 
   they did not have an accurate or saliently clear record with which to 
   reach a fair decision in this case.


Conclusion


   I do not have a Judge Frank Johnson, a Thurgood Marshal or the ACLU 
   to defend my civil rights.  Humbly and with respect, I am telling you 
   that all I have is a childish hope that you will not dismiss my case 
   and that you will allow me equal consideration in defending my right 
   to free speech.


                    James Floyd


.

.

Back to Resistance Political Front, Issue #2 of April 19, 2000
Back to The Incomparable Jim "Braveheart" Floyd Archive
Back to The Thought 4 The Day
Back to Stuff I Wish I Wrote -- But Didn't
Back to Patrick Henry On-Line