IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
TIMOTHY JAMES McVEIGH,
Petitioner-Defendant,
v.
Case No. 96-_____
(Case No. 96-CR-68-M below)
HONORABLE RICHARD P. MATSCH,
Respondent.
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OF PETITIONER-DEFENDANT,
TIMOTHY JAMES McVEIGH AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT
MARCH 25, 1997
Stephen Jones, OBA #4805
Robert Nigh, Jr., OBA #011686
Richard Burr, FBA #407402
Jeralyn E. Merritt, Esquire
Cheryl A. Ramsey, OBA #7403
Christopher L. Tritico, TBA #20232050
Of Counsel
Robert L. Wyatt, IV, OBA #13154
Michael D. Roberts, OBA #13764
James L. Hankins, OBA #15506
Randall T. Coyne, OBA #549013
Amber McLaughlin, TBA #1374098
Robert J. Warren, OBA #16123
Mandy Welch, TBA #21125380
Holly Hillerman, OBA #017055
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE NO.
OVERVIEW .......... pg. 1
I. INTRODUCTION:..........pg. 4
STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS .......... pg. 9
II. PHYSICAL AND POLITICAL MAGNITUDE OF THE DESTRUCTION OF THE ALFRED P. MURRAH BUILDING .......... pg. 9
A. Immediate Effects of the Explosion .......... pg. 9
B. The Response of the Federal Government .......... pg. 13
1. The Government's Immediate Response to the Bombing .......... pg. 14
a. Mobilization .......... pg. 14
b. Evidence From Public Sources of government Use of Intelligence Networks With Foreign Nations in the Investigation of the Alfred P. Murrah Building Bombing .......... pg. 16
C. CIA and NSA Investigation Protocol .......... pg. 17
2. Evidence of the International Scope of the Investigation and the Involvement of Organs of State Intelligence in Several U.S. Domestic Bombing Cases Including the Alfred P. Murrah Building .......... pg. 21
3. The Investigative Focus Upon Foreign Terrorists .......... pg. 24
III. THE ARREST OF TIMOTHY McVEIGH .......... pg. 28
IV. THE GRAND JURY RETURNS THE INDICTMENT OF "OTHERS UNKNOWN" .......... pg. 29
i
V. THE "OTHERS UNKNOWN" TO THE GRAND JURY .......... pg. 32
A. Elliott's Body Shop .......... pg. 32
B. Oklahoma City Eyewitnesses .......... pg. 34
C. Jeff Davis .......... pg. 35
D. Frederick Schlender .......... pg. 37
E. Legal Significance of the Existence of "Others Unknown" .......... pg. 38
VI. PRIOR WARNING, ATF INFORMANTS, AND POSSIBLE "OTHERS UNKNOWN" .......... pg. 38
A. Elohim City .......... pg. 38
B. Dennis Mahon, Andreas Strassmeir and Carol Howe .......... pg. 44
1. Dennis Mahon .......... pg. 44
2. Andreas Strassmeir .......... pg. 47
3. Carol Howe and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms .......... pg. 53
VII. BEYOND ELOHIM CITY .......... pg. 79
A. Suspect I, Posse Comitatus, and Iraq .......... pg. 79
1. Posse Comitatus .......... pg. 79
B. Saudi Report Concerning Iraq .......... pg. 81
C. FBI Special Agent Kevin Foust .......... pg. 82
2. State Sponsorship Precedent .......... pg. 85
D. Israelis Present at the Bomb Site .......... pg. 89
E. A Subject of the Investigation in the Philippines .......... pg. 91
ii
VIII. PROCEDURAL HISTORY OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS .......... pg. 101
A. Introduction .......... pg. 10l
IX. GOVERNMENT EVASION OF ITS DISCOVERY RESPONSIBILITIES .......... pg. 111
A. The Government's Restrictive Definition of Brady .......... pg. 114
B. Counsel for the Government are Powerless to Effect Disclosure of Discoverable Information from National Intelligence Agencies .......... pg. 128
X. AUTHORITY .......... pg. 137
A. Judge Matsch's Denial of Mr. McVeigh's Discovery Motions is Reviewable Upon Petition for Writ of Mandamus .......... pg. 137
B. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16 Entitles Mr. McVeigh to the Requested Discovery Material .......... pg. 138
C. The District Court Abused its Discretion by Denying Mr. McVeigh's Repeated Requests for Brady Material .......... pg. 142
D. Standard for Guidance in Search .......... pg. 144
E. Because the Material Sought by Mr. McVeigh is Material Both to Guilt and Punishment, the District Court's Abuse of Discretion Jeopardizes Both Stages of Mr. McVeigh's Capital Trial .......... pg. 146
X. SPECIFIC RELIEF REQUESTED .......... pg. 152
CERTIFICATE OF HAND DELIVERY .......... pg. 154
ii
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
United States Supreme Court Cases
PAGE NO.
151.......... Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S.51,58 (1988)
139.......... Bankers Life & Cas. Co. V. Holland, 346 U.S.379 (1953)
passim.......... Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83(1963)
147.......... Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104, 110-12(1982)
passim.......... Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150(1972)
151.......... Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S.419, 115 S. Ct. 1555, 1565-68, 131 L Ed. 2d490 (1995). 115, 142, 143, 14S
,
137.......... Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn., 319 U.S.21(1943)
16.......... Snepp v. United States, 444 U.S.507, 512 (1980)
145.......... United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S.97, 110(1976)
151.......... United State v. Bagley, 473 U.S.667, 675(1985)
136.......... United States v. Richard M. Nixon, President of the United States, 418 U.S. 683(1974)
137.......... Will v. United States, 389 U.S. 90, 95(1967)
iv
Other Federal Cases
146, 147, 148.......... Chaney v. Brown, 730 F.2d1334, 1345 (10th Cir. 1984), cert. denied,
496 U.S. 1090(1984)
150, 151, 152.......... Hopkinson v. Shillinger, 781 F. Supp. 737 (D. Wyo. 1991)
137.......... In re Joint Eastern & Southern Districts Asbestos Litigation, 22 F. 2d755(7th Cir. 1994)
12.......... Nichols v. Alley, 71 F.3d347(10th Cir. 1995)
144, 145, 146.......... Smith v. Secretary of New Mexico Department of Corrections, 50 F.3d801, 824(10th Cir.1995)
137.......... Texaco, Inc. v. Chandler, 354 F. 2d655(10th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 936(1966)
139.......... United States v. Clegg, 740 F.2d 16, 18 (9th Cir.1984)
145.......... United States ex rel Smith v. Fairman, 769 F.2d386, 391-93 (7th Cir. 1985)
138.......... United States v. Fernandez, 913 F.2d 148, 154 (4th Cir. 1990 )
140.......... United States v. George, 786 F. Sup. 11, 13(D.D.C> 1991)
145.......... United States v. LaRouche, 695 F. Supp. 1265, 1281 (D. Mass. 1988)
139.......... United States v. Mandel, 914 F. 2d 1215, 1219 (9th Cir. 1990)
85.......... United States v. McAnderson, 914 F. 2d934(7th Cu. 1990)
v
114,130 .......... United States v. McVeigh, 923 F.Supp.1310,1313(D.Colo.1996)
144.......... United States v. Perdomo, 929 F.2d967-978(3d Cir.1991)
30,104 .......... United States v. Penix, 516 F.Supp.248, 255 (W.D. Okla. 1981)
141,142.......... United States v. Poindexter, 727 F.Supp.1470(D.D.C.1989), rev.d on other " grounds, 951 F.2d366(D.C. Cir. 1991)
142,143,151.......... United States v. Rahman, 870 F.Supp.47,51(S.D.N.Y.1994)
15.......... United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d836 (9th Cir.1989)
140.......... United States v. Rezaq, 156 F.R.D.514,519(D.D.C.1994)
362.......... United States v. Ritter, 272 F.2d30,32(10th Cir.1959), cert. denied, U.S.950(1960) 137
144.......... United States v. Trevino, 556 F.2d1265, 1272 (5th Cir.1977)
140.......... United States v. Yunis, 867 F.2d617,623(D.C.1989)
140.......... United States v. Yunis, 924 F.2d1086,1095(D.C.Cir.1991)
144.......... United States v. Zuno-Arce, 44 F.3d 1420, 1427 (9th Cir.1995)
Other Authorities
137.......... 28 U.S.C.'1651(a)
129, 138,139.......... Fed.R.Crim.P.16(a)(1)(C) vi
[CONTINUED IN PART TWO]
|