>Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 00:25:36 -0800
>From: Jon Roland (jon.roland@constitution.org)
>Subject: Re: The State of the Resistance on the 5th Anniversary of Waco
>To: Martin Lindstedt (mlindste@clandjop.com)
>X-Mailer: Z-Mail Pro 6.2-beta, NetManage Inc. [ZM62_10]
>Martin, I congratulate you on a well-written historical review of the
>movement.
OK, I'll take the congradulations on my writing of the militia
movement. However, I was primarily concerned with showing the
facts such that my conclusion could be reached. This conclusion
is at odds with your preferred conclusion, however.
>However, I disagree with your assessment that the time of the public
>militias is over. Henceforth, any gathering of people to protest some
>abuse or to accomplish some reform or make some defense, most of whose
>members lean toward the use of armed force to protect their rights
>and those of others, will be perceived as a "militia" in the public
>mind, and they will be. There is no way the political arm can
>function without holding open public meetings and demonstrations,
>even if they don't display arms or engage in military or law
>enforcement training.
You yourself have just admitted that the time of the public
militias is over. Any military arm of the movement will be perceived
as "militia." Therefore, there cannot be separate arms, political
and military of the militia movement, or if there is the distinction
it be a distinction without difference, perceived or actual.
The militia movement has never been interested in pursuing any such
distinctions. All it has ever been interested in is protesting abuses
by the displaying of arms. However, upon its bluff being called, this
militia movement has not been "effective" except in filling regime
prisons.
There comes a time when protest for a series of continuing
greviances has no longer a place in Resistance activity. There
comes a time to for payback. Before that time, comes planning for
that time to activate the final resolution of grievances.
>And, as I pointed out back in March, 1994, the only way to meet
>the threat from infiltration is to recruit such vast numbers that
>infiltration is overwhelmed. This has been the ways infiltration
>has been overcome by every other successful political reform
>movement throughout American history, almost all of which were
>infiltrated.
This is akin to saying that police fists can be overcome by
providing enough patriot noses and heads to bust.
First of all, let it be understood that there will never ever
be such vast numbers in the patriot movement that we will outnumber
the vast mass of people who are perfectly happy with corruption
or so cowardly that they will do anything about it until it is
much too little much too late.
The only majority that us in the political minority will ever
have is by making ourselves into a Revolutionary Majority, to use
the phrase in an essay of that name by the Old Resistance chieftain
Louis Beam.
There has never been any such thing as a "successful reform
movement" and certainly not by the process of majority rule unless
you wish to count the actions of the Clinton regime as being a
"successful reform movement."
As I have pointed out in my article, the "only way" to meet the
reality of infiltration is through making the Resistance immune to
such tactics. This is through a process of creating "Leaderless
Resistance" cells which are only open to blood-kin or people of
long friendship. Thus even if the cell is compromised, the
infiltration stops at the cell level. The open Political Front
becomes Resistant to infiltration because of Resistance scrutiny.
If anyone ever sees me telling them that the criminal regime is
our "friend," then of course anyone is free to say that I've been
suborned.
As a practical matter of experience, it wasn't until the various
smaller Missouri militias decided to break up into cells and head
underground that two Missouri State Trooper parasites who had been
feeding upon them decided to come clean. They did quite a bit of
damage to the local militias and common-law movement before they
confessed to a 3CC delegate.
This illustrates that the militia movement is not only incapable
of detecting infiltraitors, it usually lacks the basic intelligence
to even take precautions to give infiltraitors nothing to report.
>Another of the responses I expect and have long encouraged is
>for the character of militia training to shift from military
>combat toward law enforcement and emergency response.
Should we become a fire department?
Will we be allowed in "law-enforcement" to enforce the laws of
the regime?
The patriot movement is the natural enemy of the ruling criminal
regime. Therefore, we will not be allowed to become the enforcement
arm of the criminal regime.
>We need to put more emphasis on intelligence, which is similar
>to the detective work needed in law enforcement, and which we need
>to pull out the nails of the Establishment by exposing their
>wrongdoing, and perhaps place our own infiltrators within the
>agencies and corporations where they can do the most good.
Really? The Establishment corrupt? How you do go on.
Do we need to waste limited intelligence assets in order to find
yet another pimple in the decayed corpse of the body poly-tick?
Isn't it far more efficient to simply brand the Establisment as
thoroughly corrupt and deal with them accordingly?
>What we can expect is for fewer activities to call themselves
>"militias" openly, while at the same time more and more of them
>privately recognize that they really are militias, if only at a
>low level. This would include, for example, all neighborhood
>watch and citizens on patrol operations.
The reason fewer people call themselves "militias" openly is
because people are at least beginning to understand how very
much hated we are.
You don't think the vast majority know full well about the
loss of freedom and rapidly growing corruption of the regime?
And yet they begrudge anyone who would live for a minute more
free then they in their self-induced slavery.
>All of this is proceeding according to the scenario I foresaw in
>early 1994.
>--Jon
I think you are absolutely clueless.
There is not going to be any salvation for any of us unless we
make it for ourselves.
This means we do not wait for mass-Amerika to suddenly discover
the merits of freedom after having pursued a course of mass
enslavement for the past 60, 80, 100, 200 years. After all, we were
born in a condition of freedom which has been diminished every day.
It is with the collaboration of mass-Amerika that this present reality
holds true.
Therefore, it behooves us to see reality every single day as
we work our own way to survival and freedom.
The purpose of the Resistance is not to expend itself providing
salvation and freedom for people who do not want any such thing.
We are not interested in restoring a unified CONstitutional government
to people who did not appreciate it in the first place.
Our job is rather that of revolt on behalf of the Revolutionary
majorities who have earned freedom by their own efforts. Only those
who have earned freedom and planned for survival shall both survive
and be free.
--Martin Lindstedt
http://www.mo-net.com/~mlindste
===================================================================
Constitution Society, 1731 Howe Av #370, Sacramento, CA 95825
916/568-1022, 916/450-7941VM Date: 04/20/98 Time: 00:25:37
http://www.constitution.org/ mailto:jon.roland@constitution.org
===================================================================
.
Nice write! Could have been titled: "Trial of the Resistance Movement or Taking the Fifth on the Fifth Anniversary of Waco" OR "Resistance Movement On Trial, Takes the Fifth After Waco" OR "Resistance Movement After Waco Drinks a Fifth" OR "The State of the Resistance Is the State of Confusion" OR "The De Facto State of the Resistance Is Non-existant" OR "Resistance Drinks a Fifth then Takes the Fifth On the Fifth Anniversary of Waco" OR "The Regime Wins Another Round, Five In A Row After Waco" OR "Mao Was Right, You Have To Have the Support of the People to Win" Enough of this banter... Like I said, Nice write! --Any Mouse Amusing. I think I'll put your response in the letters page, but without an address -- or with one if you wish to do it that way. In any case, we do not have the support of the people. Not right now. So should we give up and wait for our extermination? No? I think that in these days of false prosperity that now is the time to build up Resistance cadre for the time ahead. Nobody is going to be in a good mood for the time to come, and we should make appropriate plans for the future. --Martin Lindstedt.
Back to Modern Militiaman Issue #8, 5th Anniversary of Waco Edition?