X-Sender: xxxxxxxx Date: Sat, 19 Sep 1998 12:28:17 -0600 To: Martin Lindstedt (email@example.com), firstname.lastname@example.org From: xxxxxxx Subject: FYI > >FYI, this was posted on the national police list and someone >forwarded it to me a while back. The poster, a cop in a small >town in TX is a self-appointed monitor and informant re: militia, >dissidence and loyal opposition to the direction of government >today. I meant to send it earlier but got busy. I doubt that this sow is fooling anyone either in Pool Texas or anywhere else. Doubtless she is the typical mattoid criminal who in the words of Prince Kropotkin create revolutionaries because of the hatred and contempt she inspires. When this happens, not only does the criminal regime lose the uneasy neutrality of the formerly loyal citizenry, can no longer rely on public loyalty, and generate implacable revolutionaries who will settle for nothing less the extermination of the criminal regime and criminal regimeist enforcers. > Just know two things: 1: this person is a misrepresenting >busybody (affirmative action female hire) on the subject and is >posting this stuff on every restricted LE bulletin board she can >find, trying to stir the pot and exacerbate the situation by >misinforming cops, whom, as you know, are generally clueless. I don't think police are clueless. I think that it is a matter of their inherent nature. It can be expected that a social order in decline will generate masses of amoral cowardly criminal thugs, who are then set in positions of power by a criminal regime in order to enforce the will of that criminal regime. Any excuse will be used by criminal regimeists and their internal security forces to justify their oppression, such as the civil war on drugs. Since being a policeman is a matter of inherent nature, there is nothing to be gained by trying to appeal to their non-existant good nature. Their nature is to be a bully, a thug, a coward, a natural- born criminal. It is a total waste of time to even try re-educating these uncivilized criminal elements against their inherent base nature. Give them one chance, maybe two, and if they persist, then put them down. A public extermination now and then of the worst offenders will put the rest of them in line due to fear. However, since this wise and just policy has not been done for some time now, it will become necessary to exterminate them all at much the same time. And so it will be done eventually, although more in a spirit of vengenace as opposed to justice. > 2: regardless of what you think of cops, and I could care less, we aren't all mindless robots. Some of us old bastards actually believe in the Constitution and refuse to violate or participate in the violation of citizens rights. Personally, I always considered >armed citizen a resource and as back up. Trouble of it is, even if so, how exactly are the successful Revolutionaries who will win this current civil war going to distinguish between the 'good cops' and the bad ones, who engaged in criminal activity against the people, or enacted a 'code of silence' allowing the problem? (This presupposes the fact that we would be interested in doing any such thing. There is a foolproof way of breaking a 'code of silence' scheme, which relies on the nobility of the aggrieved in wanting to limit punishment to only the clearly guilty. Breaking a code of silence is easy by making it irrelevant -- you exterminate ALL the police, lawyers, politicians by making them a criminal class, sort of like the way they did with dopers.) The very same policeman who betrayed his fellow cops to the Resistance might well be the very same one who put someone away for having drugs. Could we give an amnesty for one crime against the people but ignore other crimes brought by other aggrieved? For example, I owe you a favor for the information. Yet I could not allow this favor to negate a demand for vengeance brought forward by a person who was placed in prison because of criminal regimeist legis-treason you enforced to his detriment. In a system of law brought by hard-bitten survivors with long memories, I doubt a system of amnesty is even possible even if wanted. They would insist that any method of justice must be decided by the victims, not the regime criminals who created the injustice. Thus in all good faith there could be no limit to a victim's vengeance. Under both the Law of God and the Law of Vengeance, the actions of a criminal could redound to the criminal's family. In fact this law of vengeance often took the form of a blood-feud, which was the norm of most codes of justice even among the advanced Anglo-Saxon and Teutonic and Nordic societies until the concept of weregild, then of juries replaced this concept about 700 years ago. Now we see the end of lawlessness brought about lawless laws brought about by self-serving criminals. The very foundations of civilization, 1500 years worth, have been disrupted within the past 30 years by short-sighted regime criminals. Soon we will be back to the much easier understandable concept of "two eyes for an eye and all your teeth for a tooth! Woe unto them who start something! You either finish off an enemy or you do not start!" Therefore the best method of survival is not to become affiliated in any way with the criminal classes who as a matter of policy must be exterminated, i.e., especially lawyers, politicians, police who chose their professions of evil. Let the punishment like that of unto Achan and his family fall upon the evildoers who would destroy Christian Israel. (Joshua 7:25) We will put evil from among us by destroying evildoers absolutely. > anyway, I would like to remain anonymous because I get access >to lots of info like the below piece of garbage from the idiot I >described earlier. Her name and department may be found at the >bottom of her warning forward. >Watch your six and good luck. Thank you for the information, which is always useful to the Resistance. I think you mean well, and would not do evil to you by soft-soaping reality. I think as in the case of the harlot Rahab, who assisted the scouts of the Children of Israel, that some police and their families will be saved, and should be given the chance for evaluation and possible rehabilitation. Rahab then went on to be one of the ancestors of King David. I hope that you are one of the old-timers who did not step over the line, or that if you did your victims were an understanding lot. I think the time has come for the small numbers of 'good police' to openly choose their side. Does anyone actually think this Decker sow will be allowed to go over to the winning Resistance side after a war of utter extermination has been fought in reaction to the abuses of the criminal regime? Of course not. When a criminal regime starts a total civil war, wherein the hatreds unleashed guarantee the destruction of the aggressors, that their former subjects are ungovernable. No criminal regime ever has enough of a monopoly on force and violence that it can withstand the attacks arising from a restive population. Every police state has ended with the extermination of the police, the ruling regime criminals who declared war on their own population, and the collabor-traitors who aided by silence or inaction the criminal regimeists. >Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 09:10:18 EDT >From: Martha Decker (MDeckerE64@AOL.COM) >Subject: A Patriot on the Pig-Lice > >Received this from a patriot mail list I subscribe to. Thought some >might be interested, especially anyone from Joplin. I'm sure those >from Joplin are already familiar with Martin Lindstedt. I'm getting >very familiar with Marvin and his ranting for death to all police. The Joplin Pig-lice Department knows me very well. I had a lawsuit against them for a false arrest, which was recently dismissed by a fedrule judge. It will go up to the Fedrule 8th Circus Kort of Appeals where it will be covered up, unless it goes on to join the body of kort-made 'law' which in essence says the criminal regime's piglice can do pretty much whatever they want. I think this is a useful precident myself. Given that there are no CONstitutional protections left as a result of the scheming of the criminal regimeist korts, then by definition a Revolutionary tribunal could allow for a police force to carry out a decree of extermination for the former criminal regimeists and their families. One could resurrect the Law of Cambysis II, wherein corrupt judges were skinned alive or the Ostrogothic Code of Theodoric the Great wherein those who brought false charges or perjured themselves were strangled with their intestines by the victims. That would certainly finish off most of the persecutors and piglice. And since there are no CONstitutional protections left, because the criminal regimeist korts have given 'absolute or qualified immunity' to their enforcement regime criminals, therefore there are no CONstitutional protections left proscribing attaint of blood or forfeiture of estate. Therefore the lives, families and the property of regime criminals are legally forfeit, due to criminal regimeist precident. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ><<>Date: Sun, 09 Aug 1998 16:45:55 -0500 >>To: email@example.com >>From: Martin Lindstedt (firstname.lastname@example.org) >>Subject: Posse> Tales from the Joplin Pig-lice State >>Sender: email@example.com I would inform the owner of the posse-comitatus listserver that he seems to have a piglice infilltraitor or two among the subscribers. Of course it is to be expected that the uneasy criminal regime will be constantly snooping on their natural enemies among the patriotic and revolutionary movement. However, if this Decker sow is on the list, it might be best to kick her off upon the soonest available opportunity. >>Bar Operators: Police harassed patrons -- The Joplin >> Globe -- Aug. 5, 1998 >> >>By Aaron Deslatte >>Globe Staff Writer >(SNIP) See http://www.mo-net.com/~mlindste/joplinps.html The Joplin Globe will not publish any of my letters about the criminal antics of the Joplin Pig-lice Department. Several years ago I wrote a letter detailing how a drug informant executed the brother of a black criminal who had left his brother to die by shooting him in the back of the head as he lay wounded. The testimony presented could have no other logical interpretation. The criminal brother kept on running to England, fleeing from a murder charge, as Missouri law allows someone who flees from a crime in which careless policemen have killed bystanders to be charged with murder. Eventually, the English allowed the extradition of a Maquis Rogers on condition that he not be tried for murder. The prosecutor was going to break the agreement, but the U.S. State Department threw a fit so they backed off. I think Rogers got 15-30 years for various drug-running crimes, and threatening the life of the informant. The informant got away with murder. You see, these cowardly scribblers are natural-born collaborators with the criminal regime. Being too lazy to actually report on the news, they must rely on a piglice or kort feed to fill their rags with the tales of carnage which are the staple of their papers. I simply cannot stand to read these lies any more, and certainly do not carry a paper subscription to the Joplin Glob. I only read the paper when it carries a item of interest in which it is necessary to place upon it my own spin. >> >> Notes: >> >>1. It is the City of Joplin Police Thugs who are conducting business as >usual. City Hall has deliberately unleashed these goons upon the Joplin >public. The Joplin Police Thugs know full well that they have a clear hand in >doing exactly whatever they please by the Joplin City Council. >> >> Therefore these business owners went to the public to inform the public >about the basic inherent criminality and unprofessionalism of the Joplin >Police Goons, which the Joplin City Hall has unleashed upon the public. The >contempt of the public for police criminals is the only rein that this "Thin- >Yellow-Line" of uniformed vermin knows. >> >>For all practical effect, police goons believe it is a matter of "them vs. >us" and an overwhelming show of contempt and hatred is the only way to rein >these yellow thugs in. >> > 2. So in other words, just like the LAPD getting caught beating Rodney King, >the Joplin Police Thugs got caught blocking the fire entrances and harassing >people without a warrant. In short, typical >>gubbnmintgungoon behavior caught on videotape for the general public to see >how these goon really behave, as opposed to the criminal regime propaganda >caught on the boob-toob. >> >>3. About all one can do today is to catch these regime criminals in on the >act. The judges and legis-traitors certainly won't rein in their enforcement >muscle because it their police thugs who both enforce their 'laws' and protect >regime criminals from the wrath of >>the people. These businessmen are taking a clue from what happened to the >"Book >>Barn" and "Dutch Village." The Book Barn caught these Joplin Police Thugs >dead to rights when they were harassing him several years ago and made a >complaint. The Book Barn is still around today. >> >>Roland Borel, on the other hand, had the Joplin Police Thugs raiding his >Dutch Village motel at will, supposedly for meth labs. Roland was set up by a >fake sting involving a Joplin Police Thug snitch throwing Roland a bag of meth >that these thugs sell on their >>off hours. Roland made the mistake of catching the bag and wondering what >was going on and tasting the stuff. When Roland caught on that it wasn't >sugar, and that he was being set up by this police informant, Roland bolted >for the telephone. He was caught by Pig-Lice Officer Tackett, (a lying pig >who tried to set me and Roxie up for a seat-belt >>violation charge), tapped on the leg, and told, "You're f^%$#@, buddy!" Typical piglice behavior. Pigs actually curse and use foul words, then arrest people for using lewd language when they respond in kind. What do you expect from pigs? They are called pigs because of their behavior -- which would put a four-legged pig to shame. >>Roland got out of this setup because it did not lend credit to the Joplin >Pig-Lice, but he sill had to spend $10,000 and sell his motel for less than he >had in it. Probably just as well. Roland told me that the merciless goons >used to go down to his motel on weekends and drive away any customers on his >busiest nights of the week by parking their squad cars in the driveway and >flashing their lights. See. These goons just love to do evil. A man gets ruined because of piglice behavior, and it is no big deal to the criminal regimeists. I have a better idea of deterrence. What say that a lying pig who gets caught lying were to be strangled with a length of his own intestine, then have the corpses of himself and his family displayed at the piglice academy? Wouldn't that act as a deterrant? Or have the judges sit on the flayed skins of their fellow judges who dared to act corruptly. Have the case-law books bound with the hides of judges and their families who dared usurp the function of the people and make up law based on their whims? See, what we have are regime criminals, acting according to their inherent nature, and oppressing people under color of their made-up 'law.' So the only solution is to exterminate the ruling regime criminals absolutely -- root, trunk, branch and twigs -- by imposing the real law of the LORD upon these criminals wherein their evil is put out from among us. >(SNIP) >> > >10. Ought to be grateful that the Joplin Pig-lice at least didn't do to the >bar customers and employees what the Federal Butchers, Inc. did to the Branch >Davidians after they set fire to their church. The FiBbIes, according to >information on the video documentary, Waco, the Rules of Engagement not only >destroyed with tanks most of the available exits, what exits there were left >had FiBbIe killers machine-gunning whatever women and children did try to get >out of whatever non-marked fire escapes were left. >> > >Back to The Joplin Police State? >>http://www.mo-net.com/~mlindste/joplinps.html >> >>Back to Patrick Henry On-line?>> >+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >This guy definetly does not like the police. Why he doesn't even like >the fire department. The fire department in this case support the piglice in doing something which if ordinary citizens did it would result in a stiff fine. These gubbnmint employees stick together in harassing the general public, lying and covering for them. They think it is a matter of "them vs. the general public" yet whine when the general public in self-defense treat them the exact self same way. Now I agree. It IS a matter of 'us v. them.' Either these parasitic criminals must be exterminated to the last man, or the people must be absolutely enslaved. That is the logic of the situation, and eventually it will indeed be done. The hatred and contempt is indeed building up, and doubtless the situation will be resolved in much the same way the French treated their parasitic aristocracy and the Russians treated the hated police or 'pharones.' Usually the hated pharone was publicly executed with a shot at the back of the head and their families were sent to work camps where they were systemically starved to death. It is a matter of absolutely exterminating these criminals or letting them destroy you. They have no honor, they have nothing good you can appeal to. All you can do is to overawe them by fear of punishment while making sure that as few of them breed other moral degenerates as much as possible. Let such be done as a matter of policy to the below criminal sow and her family. The below sow will never, ever profess sorrow for anything except for being caught, up until the very minute you are slitting a slice in her belly to strangle her and her litter of baby moral degenerates with a length of her lying gut. They MUST die that moral mankind can live in peace and freedom. --Martin Lindstedt > >Stay safe > >Martha Decker, Sgt. >Tool PD TX - this morning anyway! >.
X-Sender: xxxxxxx Date: Mon, 21 Sep 1998 To: Martin Lindstedt (firstname.lastname@example.org) From: xxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Texas Piglice Sow At 06:11 PM 9/21/98 -0500, Martin Lindstedt wrote:.>> I don't think police are clueless. I think that it is a matter >>of their inherent nature.>You should have had to work with the thugs, bureaucrats and >braindead I did. >> Since being a policeman is a matter of inherent nature, there >>is nothing to be gained by trying to appeal to their non-existant >>good nature. >I don't think all of them are a species, as much as people looking >for a civil service job that doesn't require a lot of work. Then >there are a significant number who are into the power and having a >piece. Then there are the 2% who actually want to help people. >Unfortunately they are soon disabused of that notion by the system >and only the very strongest can hang on. ----------- I think that the strongest and best leave. There is absolutely nothing worth saving now. ----------- >> For example, I owe you a favor for the information. Yet I >>could not allow this favor to negate a demand for vengeance >>brought forward by a person who was placed in prison because >>of criminal regimeist legis-treason you enforced to his detriment. >I can take care of myself, thanks, I wasn't doing you a favor, I >did it for my self because it was the right thing to do. I hate >snitches and affirmative action weasels. ------------- I wish you good luck then. I hope that a system of amnesty can be worked out for the very few policemen who somehow managed to keep themselves clean. Revolutionaries have always used the honorable disenchanted among the police in order to counter-infiltrate and destroy police networks. Michael Collins used Irish men and women who had had enough working for the English as traitors to their own people in Dublin Castle. I have no doubt that there are policemen who are sickened enough at the destruction of our social order that they will desert to our side, hoping for mercy and forgiveness for exemplerary service. Also, if it is believed that there is no hope, the enemy will not surrender if it means that they will indeed be exterminated on sight. So there is still room for choosing a side, today it must be chosen. After a certain point it will be much too late. Perhaps, due to my hatred of the criminal regime and its servants of evil, I am not the person who should be entrusted with recruiting honorable policemen. Due to the nature of the person I have become I would be better suited to forming, say, a Revolutionary Brigade devoted to bringing regime criminals to justice, as opposed to running a counter-espionage ring in the police department. --M.L. -------------- >> In a system of law brought by hard-bitten survivors with long >>memories, I doubt a system of amnesty is even possible even if >>wanted. >I paid for the system myself with my own blood and that of others >while serving in South East Asia, as did thousands of my brothers. >I don't need any amnesty. I am responsible for all of my actions. That is an honorable approach. >> Therefore the best method of survival is not to become >>affiliated in any way with the criminal classes who as a matter >>of policy must be exterminated, i.e., especially lawyers, >>politicians, police who chose their professions of evil. Let >>the punishment like that of unto Achan and his family fall upon >>the evildoers who would destroy Christian Israel. (Joshua 7:25) >>We will put evil from among us by destroying evildoers >>absolutely. >Time does not permit my to relate why I resigned from the >"profession". Suffice to say that I couldn't deal with it anymore >and was running afoul of them myself. I'm not a patriot, I just >believe in the Bible and the Constitution.....very seriously. >> Thank you for the information, which is always useful to the >>Resistance. I think you mean well, and would not do evil to you >>by soft-soaping reality. I think as in the case of the harlot Rahab, >>who assisted the scouts of the Children of Israel, that some police >>and their families will be saved, and should be given the chance >>for evaluation and possible rehabilitation. Rahab then went on to >>be one of the ancestors of King David. I hope that you are one of >>the old-timers who did not step over the line, or that if you did >>your victims were an understanding lot. > >You are most welcome. I would normnally resent the comparison >with a harlot but I do understand your point. My Mother is a Judge >in XXXXXX, who also thinks you are right. As for my "victims", I >sleep quite well, actually, having struggled as any Christian >does to never violate God's Law or the Constitution. Having >worked violent crimes against children and homicide I did the >best I could in speaking for the real victims. Having worked >Internal Affairs, I've rooted out and sent to prison my share of >corrupt and brutal pigs. I have no victims, save those whose >lives I took or wounded in Vietnam, and I have prayed for >forgiveness. ------------- I hate judges the most, as the evil could not have gotten hold of this country without judges. However, I shall still wish you the best until such time as matters can be sorted out in the interests of as perfect a justice as can be made. ------------- > I think the time has come for the small numbers of 'good police' >to openly choose their side. >It is happening, slowly, but it's a beginning. The younger ones >are lost to us tho. The schism is from age 35 down and 35 up, >the younger ones having no clue about the Constitution and >certainly very little religious training. -------------- That is certainly the case. Some of the older ones sometimes have at least the grace to look guiltily before they look away. --------------- >>Does anyone actually think this Decker sow will be allowed to go >>over to the winning Resistance side after a war of utter >>extermination has been fought in reaction to the abuses of the >>criminal regime? Of course not. >I certainly hope not. >>When a criminal regime starts a total civil war, wherein the >>hatreds unleashed guarantee the destruction of the aggressors, >>that their former subjects are ungovernable. No criminal regime >>ever has enough of a monopoly on force and violence that it can >>withstand the attacks arising from a restive population. >As a student of history I agree. >>Every police state has ended with the extermination >>of the police, the ruling regime criminals who declared war on >>their own population, and the collabor-traitors who aided by >>silence or inaction the criminal regimeists. >And so it should be, although you are discounting the use of >nazi and japanese police and military in their old jobs after >the war, for just two examples. So much for every police state >exterminating the police post-end of police state... --------------------- The case of the Nazi and Japanese ex-soldiers and police is the case of them being defeated by outside forces, not as the result of being on the losing end of a civil war. In the case of the Nazis and Japanese, our criminal regime needed these subjugated peoples' police forces in order to keep track of their populations. The Russians were in exactly the same predicament. They used the extraordinarily efficient German poletzei in the same manner they used the German rocket scientists. However, contrast the way Tzarist police were treated by the Russians after the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution and the French parasitic aristocrats were treated by the French peasantry. While some police and some aristocrats were spared, it was in relationship to their use to the revolutionary regime. Nine out of ten lost their lives. Revolutionary realities will dictate a similar result upon a successful Revolution in this country. Even if this Revolution is unsuccessful in certain spots, in order to make the necessary concessions to the People, there will be a giving up of the mass of criminal regimeists as scapegoats for the sins of the criminal regime. Either way, there is no return to the status quo ante. ----------------- > I appreciate your forthrightness and literate discourse. My >intent, sir, was to let you know that this piglette is doing >her level best to stir up emotion, which, as you know, does not >relate to the Constitution. I thought it was immoral, wrong >and criminal and notified you. She will bring her on Consequence >upon her. Again, good luck and if I see more, I'll ship it your >way if you wish. As for my sins, I'll trust in God's judgement >in the Next Life, and worry not a whit for my safety in this one >for He watches over me and to Him alone do I answer. Let His >will be done. >Again, I sincerely wish you Godspeed and good luck. We all have >our hands full. >XXXXXXXXXX. --------------- You have given me a good deal to think about. While I do not believe in giving mercy for evil, I must on occassion realize that mercy and restraint are not wasted upon the innocent. I hope that if we do meet on opposing forces on the field of battle that events will be such that a perfect justice can be arranged, although things do not usually work out that way. Other than this, I can say no more, as the Resistance relies on me and a few others like myself have to be the moral absolutists necessary to engineer the total civil warfare necessary for a complete victory. --Martin Lindstedt Resistance Political Front
Back to The Joplin Police State
Back to Thought For The Day
Back to Patrick Henry On-Line