It is interesting how the items of vital interest to a civilization seldom catch the interest of a society at the time, and yet, decades or centuries later historians will say that that particular item marked a nexus, a turning point from which things would never be the same..One such item is the dismissal of state "involuntary manslaughter" charges in a federal court against a federal sniper who deliberately murdered a woman, a wife, a mother whose only crime was to be the guiding light of a man who was adjudged at the time to be an enemy of the state.
This item didn't make the front page of the major newspapers, other than those few newspapers which are less than enamored with the current regime. In fact, in most newspapers it was nothing more than an Associated Press report buried somewhere on page four or page six. But yet it made a profound difference to those patriotic, concerned Americans who had been following this case closely.
A U.S. District Judge accepted the "Justice Department's" argument that a regime sniper "was acting in the line of duty" when he deliberately murdered an unarmed woman holding her baby, and, "under the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. CONstitution," was immune from a sovereign state's prosecution for acting "within the scope of his job."
The above reasoning is an invitation to civil war, an invitation which shall of course be accepted, and acted upon. A total civil war with all the horror that phrase encompasses. A total civil war which will end in the absolute victory or absolute defeat of one side or the other because nothing else will do.
.
There has been a split between the patriotic groups as to the ends of their activities in the past five years. There are some who have insisted that the CONstitution protects us all, and all that is necessary was a return, somehow, to CONstitutional government. And there were the Revolutionists, who insisted that nothing less than Revolution and the secession into like-minded nationalities was the goal, and that the use of violence to achieve that goal was not only acceptable, but necessary. After the Horiuchi decision of May 14, 1998, the Revolutionists have been proven right, and the CONstitutionalists have been proven inadequate.
A similar debate occurred between Loyalists and Revolutionists in this country in 1774-1776. The Revolutionists became known as the Patriots because the political realities favored their point -- that the English regime was too corrupt and too far away to rule over the local affairs of their sovereign nationalities. Similarly, the debate between CONstitutionalists and Revolutionists shall end the same way, with the Revolutionists winning because CONstitutionalism, like Loyalism, will be deemed to be nothing more than a mindless worship of a facade of spurious legitimacy behind which a murderous, corrupt and idiotic regime cowers. Today in our outrage we are all vengeful Revolutionists, screaming and hollering for gubbnmintgungoon ichor. Tomorrow, us real Revolutionists will snipe at any CONstitutionalists trying to sneak back to their battered barricades of CONstitutional-idolatry. Unable to justify their civic religion, caught in a crossfire between the regime and Revolutionists, they must come to a decision to put up or shut up, to pick one side or the other. This polarization of the population has always been the forerunner of civil warfare, as there becomes no neutral position other than caught between a crossfire in a no-man's land, wherein nothing can live, and survival then depends on making it to the trenches of one side or the other.
.
The decision of May 14, 1998 was no real surprise to Revolutionists. We knew the regime korts would take the side of regime gubbnmintgungoons. The regime and the regime korts depend for their continued survival and rule upon letting their mercenary thugs have a free hand in the murder and rapine of the uncowed elements of the subject population. And nothing was harmed. Mrs. Weaver is no deader than she was on May 13, 1998. Because of the decision on May 14, 1998 our political and moral position was strengthened immeasurably.
Judge Lodge's decision was in keeping with the highest standards of CONstitutional-idolatry. The so-called founding fathers betrayed the Revolution of 1776 by setting up a concealed tyranny behind which they could rule behind "the people of the United States" in preference to setting up an open, and thus more responsible, tyranny of the aristocratic elements who overthrew the British regime. So under CONstitutionalism, (a particularly sniveling, sneaking variety of -ism no less murderous or thieving than any other brand of -ism, but yet a whole lot more dishonest) ANYTHING GOES that the ruling regime can sneak past the ox-like eunuchoid stupidity of the masses. CONstitutionalism doesn't set up so much a dictatorship of the proletariat as such might ensure some measure of responsibility for the well-being of the human-cattle masses. No, rather CONstitutionalism seeks to exploit the masses while at the same time setting them up as hostages to fortune to the non-existent good will and sense of responsibility of their hidden rulers.
So federal sniper Lon Horiuchi was indeed "acting in the line of duty" when he shot some fractious human cow in the head. The feeling was strong, and doubtless correct, that she was the one who was the strength and brains in the Weaver family. So what could be more appropriate than to splatter her brains all over her husband, infant, and home, thus taking the fight out of these white separatists who had committed the unpardonable sin of wanting to live apart from the scrutiny of a monstrous criminal regime? In such matters it is usually the female of the species who is the most dangerous. So, when she opened the cabin door to allow her husband and family friend under fire to run on in, it was an easy matter for sniper Horiuchi to take advantage of his chance to put the HRT with extreme prejudice on Mrs. Weaver. Such a course of action had doubtless been urged upon himself and the other federal killers. With orders to kill the men on sight, there would be other chances for further shooting, but this priority bag had to come first so as to be blamed as an 'accident.' Given opportunity, the Weaver residence could be set afire, SOP for gubbnmintgungoons in the Robert Matthews, Gordon Kahl, David Koresh, and Carl Drega cases. The fire is set by these engines of despotism, the charred bodies are autopsied by regime 'forensic experts,' and all evidence is destroyed except for racist, bomb making, or child pornographic literature and/or drugs & fully automatic weaponry. Such trophies must somehow survive the fire so that they can be displayed in order for the media to hold a infotainment show-trial and return a verdict of guilty on the six o'clock news. It was not the fault of Killer Horiuchi that a reporter saw a helicopter carrying a bladder of gasoline over the Weaver place and the 'accidental fire' had to be called off. Horiuchi did his job, and carried out his duty to murder people who get in the way of CONstitutional gubbnmint. He made a splendid shot, and it was the rest of the regime murderers and criminals who fell down on the job of fully covering the matter up.
U.S. District Court Judge Lodge made the correct CONstitutional decision as well. The Supremacy Clause of the CONstitution can does indeed mean that federal government employees, are immune from suit in state korts. Otherwise, they couldn't murder, kidnap, rape, rob or steal with impunity on behalf of the federal regime. This is the natural consequence of a long line of federal regime kort decisions that for all practical purposes pretends that citizens made subject to the federal regime have no rights that the government need respect.
While one of the complaints in the Declaration of Independence concerned the practice of the then-current British regime of
Protecting them [murderous regime troops], by a mock trial, of any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:one must remember that this Declaration of Independence from the former regime was deliberately betrayed by forming another regime, which would with the absence of any accountability (under CONstitutionalism) inevitably decay into one far more monstrous and corrupt.
.
So given that the end result of CONstitutionalism is state-sponsored terrorism, what is a Patriot to do? The answer is quite simple.
CONstitutionalism says that murder and terrorism are quite acceptable practices provided that it is the state which commits these practices. The police can kick down doors, steal property, kidnap citizens or murder them and such is quite legal. The legislature passes legislation criminalizing more and more of the population, the executive branch fills the prisons or executes out of hand population undesirables, and the judiciary, as did Judge Lodge, gives a 'legal' gloss to state criminality.
So, in a spirit of revenge and a will to power, Revolutionists will take on the moral configuration of the criminal regime. They must, as it is a matter of survival. So in places where Revolutionists set up their regimes, their soldiery have a perfect moral right to do unto the regime criminals that which was done to them. Therefore, in the areas where Revolutionists set up their government, the massacre of regime criminals and their families is perfectly 'legal' as well. It should be an easy task to put a Revolutionist Judge Lodge on the bench to hold a drumhead courts martial for the former ruling regime police, lawyers, politicians, judiciary and their families. There will doubtless be much rejoicing if Killer Horiuchi were to fall within the jurisdiction of a Revolutionary court.
The key to CONstitutionalism is that the ruling regime can do whatever it wants and it bears no moral responsibility for its conduct provided it claims to rule in the name of the people. Since the ruling fiction claims that it is the will of the people which rules, the reality of them being hostages to the conduct of their rulers comes into play. Unlike a monarchy or overt dictatorship wherein the blame for regime criminality can be localized, in a so-called democracy or republic the whole population shares in the responsibility for regime criminality. After all, they had the option -- and duty -- to revolt. Therefore, in every civil war wherein the forces of regime and Revolution contend, there has never ever been any recognition that there are any innocents among the general population. This is why civil warfare is the bloodiest type of war, because by its logic it must lead to the total extinction or subjugation of one side or the other and everybody has got to pick a side.
(For those who are of godly bent who do not care to believe the above political analysis concerning the nature and inevitability of total civil warfare coming to Amerika, I would urge them to sneak a peek or two at the Book of Revelations to look at much the same forecast provided by divine revelation.)
.
This is why the May 14, 1998 regime kort decision by a regime kort judge in favor of a regime criminal who murdered on behalf of a criminal regime was of such importance. Such things have happened all the time before one Mrs. Weaver got murdered by a regime thug. More unknown Mrs. Weavers will be murdered by lesser-known regime thugs. But what made this decision of such importance is that it was noticed by the fighting forces of both regime and Revolutionists.
The more stupid and thuggish gubbnmintgungoons will reckon -- correctly -- that it is open season on whomever they care to put the HRT to. The cowardly elements among the regime thugs, those concerned with covering up the increasingly open murders, kidnappings, rapes and robberies committed by fellow regime criminals from public scrutiny will be despised and lose power within the police forces and regime councils. Likewise, the CONstitutionalists will lose any moral standing and political influence among Revolutionist councils. The center cannot hold, things fall apart, and mere blood-drenched anarchy is unleashed upon a deserving world as the militants on both sides eventually rule absolutely.
So will things fall apart tomorrow? No. There is an unwritten line, known by the natural leadership of both regime and Revolutionist, beyond which all hell shall be unleashed. The trick is to sucker the other side into crossing that line first, beyond which crossing that line is not only permitted, but essential to winning the total war. Eventually the line shall be crossed, but the side which first crosses it loses that thing of most importance in warfare -- the moral initiative. Therefore the escalation of tensions in order to force the other side to first cross the unwritten line beyond which the gates of hell beckon. Both sides must escalate tensions, as failure to do so means a de facto default surrender of that pearl of great price -- the moral and political initiative.
Armed struggle between the police and the population is becoming commonplace. Most of these confrontations do not involve the regime forces of which the police are a part or open militiamen which are part of the Revolutionists. Most of these confrontations are between thuggish regime police and an increasingly desperate population. But when militiamen and police forces clash, the matter becomes very well known as all concerned instinctively know full well that such is a dress rehearsal for Götterdämmerung.
.
Yet the lifeline of civilization becomes more and more frayed everyday. The regime kort decision of May 14, 1998 snapped off a few more threads. Eventually this lifeline, weakened by accumulated abrasions, shall snap, triggered by some small thing, some event unforeseen by both the leadership of regime and Revolutionists. And once that event occurs, like Concord and Lexington, or the Bastille, or the firing of the armored cruiser Potempkin, things will never be the same. For Revolutionists inevitably win. All they must do to win is to destroy the old, corrupt regime.
Making sure that the Revolution acts to restore or create a living social order is the difficult part. Successful Revolutionists make sure they win the peace. Since the Revolt was against a false democracy, the order of the next cycle for our civilization shall be open, authoritarian rule by a proven natural aristocracy.
.
.
Please, my fellow Revolutionists, let us ensure that our Revolution is a Revolt FOR Civilization. We must set up a successor regime in which absolute power is always chained up to absolute responsibility.
Judge Clears FBI shooter at Ruby Ridge ---------------------- The Associated Press ---------------------- BOISE, Idaho -- A federal judge Thursday dismissed involuntary manslaughter charges against the FBI sharpshooter who killed the wife of white separatist Randy Weaver during the 1992 siege at Ruby Ridge, Idaho. U.S. District Judge Edward Lodge accepted the Justice Department argument that Lon Horiuchi was acting in the line of duty when he fired and was protected by the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution which keeps federal agents from state prosecution for actions within the scope of their job. Boundary County Prosecutor Denise Woodbury charged Horiuchi last August with firing the shot that went through the cabin door and killed Vickie Weaver. It was the third death in the 11-day standoff that began when federal marshalls tried to arrest Weaver on a gun charge at his isolated mountain cabin. Woodbury maintained Horiuchi acted negligently. Horiuchi contended throughout that he was following procedures set out for dealing with the Ruby Ridge confrontation. The unusual "rules for engagement" told federal lawmen to fire at anyone moving. _______________________________________________________________ Page 7A, The Joplin Globe, Friday, May 15, 1998.
