At 09:32 PM 01/11/2000 -0600, a former Hoffman supporter wrote: >Nothing like putting one's foot in one's mouth, is there? He can write >but he proves here he doesn't 'reason well' obviously from the use of >'platitudes', 'shibboleths', 'media images' and a false dichotomy of >'the resistance'. Jews are generous to jew causes and to promote 'their >cause'. It is the goyim and each other they love to cheat. I don't need >Hoffman as much as he needs me and I do subscribe to his hardcopy and >have bought some books. I dont' give a shit about Irving, Lipstedt and >what the fuck the New York Times 'sez'. Much of his stuff, excuse me, >is rehashed, 'been there, done that, said that' in many cases. Another writer, Harold Covington, says that all these "Great White Leaders" start out the same way -- in first getting a check or so, and then thinking that they have "A RIGHT" to continued support so they no longer have to earn a real living. In effect, these people are more like merchants and tradesmen putting a value on their wares that most other people do not -- hence Hoffman's snit about only a half-dozen or so "paying their fair share." How much does it cost to keep up an Internet account and a WWW page? How much does it cost to maintain a listserver? Little or nothing! And yet these people seem to think that their primary job is to be well-fed like a tele-evangelist instead of serving the People of which they say that they serve. I've printed up newsletters and I haven't made a dime from this activity. I've put up WWW pages and set up free listservers, and haven't made the cost of ISP fees. But was it for that reason I have done this? NO! Else I would have quit a long time ago. I am pleased that I have an inheritance and know a trade so that I can support myself and my family. But Resistance activity is not profitable in a monetary sense. This is why racial patriotism is so very hard to find in this day and time. Holohoaxianity has no evidence and nothing in the way of proof to sustain it. Yet Revisionism seems to harp on the point that putting six million or 600,000 or 666 evil ashkenaz-gogsspawn to their just reward is a matter of concern. Why? Why not forthrightly say that six billion of these satanic brood was not nearly enough? > I don't have money to send, PERIOD. finito, 'basta', I don't have time >for all the assholes around here who ask, 'where have you been?' or some >dumb insulting broad, 'why don't you call me some time?" Tell them that you haven't been around them because you've had all you could stand of them to begin with. >------- Forwarded Message Follows ------- >Date sent: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 16:59:22 -0800 >Subject: Advisory from Hoffman >From: "Independent History & Research" (firstname.lastname@example.org) >To: email@example.com > >The Hoffman Wire >Jan. 11, 2000 >ADVISORY > >Since I wrote last December concerning financial support for THE HOFFMAN >WIRE, I have heard from a little more than a half-dozen contributors out >of nearly 2,000 recipients of THE HOFFMAN WIRE. > >I cannot write this online bulletin for seven people. You should write this bulletin for one person -- yourself. You have 2,000 direct recepients and untold thousands reading your stuff. Why you need to have more? >Many of the others must imagine that pundits, commentators and analysts >are a dime a dozen and while they "hate to see Hoffman go, someone else >will soon arise to take his place." Hoffman didn't need to go. Hoffman went off in a huff because he wasn't getting enough money. >I do not doubt that. The amateur quality of the Internet is both endearing >and distressing; endearing in that it provides opportunities for neophytes >who may develop into journalists with a great deal of practice and >patience, and distressing because a host of people who should stick to >plumbing, shade-tree auto mechanics and encylopedia-selling, fancy the >notion that journalism is neither a discipline nor an art, but something >almost anyone can do and these "anyones" then flood the Internet with >their two cents worth, which is usually worth slightly less than that. Journalism is akin to whoredom. There are no shortage of whores about. Pussy and opinions are akin to assholes -- everyone got at least one of these fungible commodities. Hoffman is merely pissed because so many people told him what his commodities was worth by their actions. >If memory serves me I am the only former establishment journalist working >in hard-core World War Two revisionism and conspiracy research. If memory serves you right, then you should remember that only six people were willing to give you some real money for your professional opinion. If you have an audience of at least 2,000, then cutting it by that amount is not going to help you in your book-selling endeavors. That's just it. The Internet is a medium in which billions are being sunk and in which the level of 'programming' seeks the lowest common denominator. There is both good and bad on this new medium. Whining about how you are not getting enough money is no way in which to run your business. If you wish to be a paytriot merchant, then sell stuff to the suckers. If you wish to be a patriot, then understand that you are guaranteed nothing that will please the worshippers of mammon. >I don't >think other professional journalists are rushing to fill my shoes and >contrary to Internet opinion, journalism is not akin to checkers; it is >not something one merely picks up in a month or two of puttering. We would >never imagine that a cabinet-maker could learn his craft without years of >toil and study, yet we imagine that journalism is a hobby one readily >acquires, rather like a sunburn. It is not that at all. How many artists of genius were neglected in their day but never noticed until they were dead? Quite a few. They did not fit in to the money-grubbing culture of their day, which is why they were of that generation unrecognized. Yet eventually their genius was recognized and their work is given high honor. Perhaps they did what they had to do because material wealth did not matter to them, or at least not enough to where they quit what they produced because it was self-satisfying. >Be that as it may, as a professional I must attend to those endeavors--our >website, hardcopy newsletter and the authoring of books and >pamphlets--which keep me fighting for the truth while also keeping the >ghost of hunger and homelessness from my door. You got a 2,000 member direct audience predisposed to buy your stuff that you accumulated over a period of time -- yet you are going to throw it all away because they did not contribute enough money to you? Why? How does it cost you any more money with a 2,000 member e-mailing list than a 1,000 member list, or even just a six-member list? Whatever happened to the injunction to remember the lilies of the field, how they toil not, neither do they sow, yet King Solomon himself was not arrayed so fine? Or to neither take gold nor silver nor even brass in your purses when you go out to proclaim the gospel? Whatever happened to faith that the LORD would provide for that which one truly needs? Your petulance means that you shall be able to provide even less for your own needs. Now I did not take your e-mail newsletter because I did not find it of sufficient worth to even ask for it for free. Yet some people found it worth their time to read. Intrigued, they ended up buying stuff advertised on your WWW page. And now, like a TalmudVision tele-evangelist you wish to proclaim that since not enough was dropped into the collection plate that your worldly ministry will come to an end? >A great deal has happened in the last few days--the monumental failure of >the militia/fundamentalist/right wing Y2K hoax (put over in a curious >alliance with the government and the media); the publication of Kim >Murphy's landmark, frontpage article on revisionism in the LA Times, and >today, David Irving's opening address at the Lipstadt libel trial in >London. You put the blame for the Y2K hoax on the very same people who you rely upon to buy your books. You seem to have a huckster's contempt for the mark. This ill-concealed contempt may be the reason that your offering plate is bare. And what about your fellow revisionists? Do they not deserve to have the attention and support of your former 2,000 member listserver? >Had enough of you shown with your wallets, and not just with the kind of >empty, laudatory rhetoric I get in E-mail, that you cared for my work, >then I would be reporting and digesting these and other subjects now. If you wish to go on strike until the militia/fundamentalist/right wing people you despise decide to fill the collection plate, then I would suppose you will have a long, long, long strike ahead of you. >But I suppose the same foolishness that led so many of you to quake in >fear when midnight of Jan. 1 struck is also pandemic when it comes to a >hard-boiled assessment of the critical importance of trained journalists >to the success of our cause. Such wordsmiths are not a dime a dozen and >they do not simply fall out of the sky. Why is it that this "trained journalist" has the same sneering contempt for those who choose to buy an extra case of canned goods or an additional brick of .22 ammunition that his fellow "trained journalists" in the regular j*wsmedia have? This shows an inherent contempt for his audience common to most "trained journalists." Is it any wonder that his audience will give this "trained journalist" neither money nor attention? I've taken "journalism" classes before. I've not seen any ability to write anything other than the mammon-onanisms common to this degenerate lot. Is it any wonder that the masses (those still able to read) have abandoned the platitudes of "trained journalism" for favor of the raw gossip, scandal, and unruly rambunctiousness of the Internet -- most of them who provide the content who simply would not recognize how to be a "trained journalist" or even give a rat's ass if they found one? All that is required for "journalism" is to give a concise report on Who, What, Where, When, How -- and Why. That and the courage for unblushing honesty in doing so. I have seen untrained people who did not finish high school and never took a journalism course who have beat the stuffing out of "trained journalists" who owe no allegiance to the truth, or reason or anything except the gods of this world. The best off-hand that I can recall is Jim Floyd -- a natural "grab 'em by the nuts" gut- writer. I cannot archive enough of his writings concerning the thoughts of the common man. And he doesn't ask for a single penny for people distributing via the Internet his Resistance samisdat far and wide. "Trained journalists" huh? Who needs 'em? >>From henceforth I'll restrict my E-mailings to emergencies, notifications >of my picketing and protest activism, time and location of my speeches, >ads for my books and other brief bulletins. And you expect to keep 2,000 people on what will become a spamlist largely devoid of content? >I do not do this in a penal spirit. I am not seeking to punish my >parsimonious E-mail audience. I simply cannot afford to spend my time in >this forum any longer; minimum remuneration is required and is not >forthcoming. Therefore I must of necessity discontinue these HOFFMAN >WIREs, at least in so far as veteran readers have come to know them since >1998, because they take too much valuable time away from other projects >that have earned the support of paying readers and listeners. Of course you do this in a penal spirit. It costs nothing to distribute your works over e-mail or a listserver. The things are FREE. You are merely throwing a tantrum because you haven't been paid as much as you want and expect to be paid. All of which is fine by me. There are scholars such as Willie Martin who distribute learned discourse on Christian Israeliteism on many listservers at a time. Or survivalist gurus such as Kurt Saxon or Frugal Squirrel or the wonderful people on the survivalist newsgroups who give away much of their knowledge away freely. If one wants to know more and have it available, then they will sell full access to their WWW pages or cut off a CD-ROM for the reciepient to print off the sections which are of greater worth. Best of all, these people honestly admit that they are in the business of selling books or information. They provide samples to whet the appetite for their wares. They do not throw a tantrum against the 99% who take the freebies but rather enjoy the custom of the one percent who figured out that it is far better to pay $3 for further access to their WWW page or $50 for five big books on a CD-ROM than to spend hours and days hunting down the information for themselves and photocopying it in a library. I run a WWW page myself. I have no problem with people downloading 8 megs of my WWW page or them buying a CD-ROM for $15 with that and other stuff on it. Likewise, David and Katya Lane placed on their WWW page their "Focus14" Resistance writings, but for the convenience of others they collected them in an anthology and put them out in a quality paperback that they sell for $20. I can imagine that they would be pleased if they reached 2,000 people via e-mail to look at their books. But I do not see them whining about how the Resistance has a duty to support them. >You can follow my regular news leads on our website at >http://www.hoffman-info.com/news.html and my investigative reporting >appears in our bimonthly hardcopy newsletter, REVISIONIST HISTORY. >I do not pretend to know what the demise of THE HOFFMAN WIRE portends for >revisionism. Perhaps it is a harbinger of nothing of consequence. But one >thing I do know is that too many people identified as right wing or >revisionist believe that their bank accounts will, in the end, save them. >Such people do not deserve to win. You seem to be complaining quite a bit about your bank account -- or the lack of its fullness. When it all comes down to it, what has "professional Revisionism" accomplished? I cannot think of anyone who is a true White Nationalist or Christian Israelite who is in any way regretful that six million ashkenaz-gogsspawn are alleged to have been killed in the mythical extermination camps in Germany. Remember, we are of the same genetic background as Custer, Sheridan, Crockett & Boone, and other settlers who killed a whole passel of redskins and shoved the placid ones onto reservations. We all know our real racial history and make no apologies for necessary savagery necessary to establish White Western Civilization. So as a result, going about 'disproving' the lies of the Whigger/Ashkenaz NWO/ZOG CONstitutional Imperial Establishment is rather low on the financial appropriations list. >I have before me the latest issue of Morris Dees' "Southern Poverty Law >Center Report," which lists those major donors who, in the month of >October alone, named Mr. Dees or his center, as beneficiaries "in their >wills and other planned gifts" (annuities). > >In one month alone, seventy-four people showered Dees and his Poverty >Palace with their largesse, including Eva Friedlander, Cecilia Goldberger, >George Goldfrank, William Popper, Rev. P.D. McKinney, Samuel Komoroff etc. > This list of major donors does not include the thousands of small >contributions Dees' organization received in October. So the Whigger/Ashkenaz Establishment is paying off their propagandists. I for one think that it might not be a bad thing if you had more Ashkenaz holohoaxers all competing for every penny the Whigger/Ashkenaz Establishment got. Remember the recent delicious revenge of NBC/ABC/CBS being blackmailed by the NAACP to replace (via affirmative action) gliberal whiggers with real-live congoids? The screams of hurt and outrage by 'betrayed' establishment gliberal whiggers sacrificed to end 'racism' certainly was music to my ears. Let the j*wsmedia be full of congoids, latrinos, gooks taking the well-paid positions away from gliberal whiggers for all I care. White gentlefolk have no need for looking at khazar propaganda anyway. I, for one, cannot imagine a more fitting revenge than to be asked in the post Civil War 2 Bantustans by the free congoids if I would like to help castrate white whigger piglice, lawyers, legistraitors and their children so that their flesh will be tender and full of flavorful fat for a delicious stewpot of "Creme of Capon-Whigger Soup." >It is not hard to understand how Dees' totalitarian fiats have been >institutionalized in America's schools and news rooms. He has the selfless >support of benefactors who--though they are on the wrong side--value >something more than money. Our side, meanwhile, with its otiose >chest-thumping about "Aryan spirituality" and "love of the folk," actually >out-Jews the 'Jews' when it comes to giving even the most meagre support >to the writers and reporters revisionism so desperately needs. If money is what you value, then perhaps you are on the wrong side. Either that, or you have not been able to show how revisionism is more important to White survival than an additional bushel of bulk grain or brick of .22 ammunition. >The other day someone recommended that I quit revisionism and work >full-time in advertising (through a sub-contractor, I have for some years >now been occasionally writing copy for some of the ads you see in >magazines and newspapers). I told him I can't quit because I am too angry. >My anger at the state of the world is volcanic, and accumulating money >while failing to fight the system would drive me crazy. I have to fight. I >must fight and I do fight with every resource available. By such means I >sustain my inner self, with or without stipends from right wing and >revisionist money bags. Remember Paul of Tarsus? He provided for his own support by weaving tents. And look what he accomplished without having to ask for stipends or haul out the collection plate every so often. >So I am not quitting revisionism, with which I have been involved, in one >capacity or another, since I was a child in 1967. But you have told me, in >roundabout fashion, that to you, THE HOFFMAN WIRE is not even worth the >price of a meal in a nice restaurant, or of a case of beer. Well, your 2,000+ listserver audience has just been told by you -- in a roundabout way-- that you want money; at least 10 bucks a head. Not getting a guaranteed income of $20,000 per year makes you so angry that you have no choice other than to make sure that you don't get even six times $10, or sixty dollars. Way to go. You have now told 2,000 minus six people that they are cheaper than khazarian j*w parasites and that they are not going to get anymore free issues because you are angry that you have not been treated in the style that a "professional journalist" like yourself deserves. That ought to just loosen their purse-strings. Very well, then. So be it. >I refuse to work for such people, in part because I have trouble >distinguishing them from my enemies. There is something creepy and >ignominious about those who run around poking fun at Jewish miserliness, >while exhibiting a far more virulent--and suicidal--brand of >penny-pinching. > >Michael A. Hoffman II For some reason, I suppose that your 2,000+ ex-audience has the same problem distinguishing you from their enemies. They probably find you "creepy and ignominious" and no better than a ashkenaz-gogsspawn money-grubber as well. Nobody hired you to be a "professional journalist" or a tenured revisionist. If you expect to get rich from your former audience, then you have another think coming. If you wish to cut off your nose to spite your face, then I suppose you are taking advantage of free auto-rhinoplasty, a speciality for which Khazars usually must pay out of the nose if they want to pass for White. Get over yourself. There is no money to be made in being a patriot. --Martin Lindstedt Resistance Political Front >Hoffman is a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated >Press. He edits Revisionist History newsletter and is the founder and >president of the Campaign for Radical Truth in History. > >Help Mr. Hoffman obtain a larger audience by sending your generous >donation of cash, check, money order or Visa or Master Card to: Why? Mr. Hoffman just alienated what little audience he was able to acquire over the years. I wouldn't advise giving Mr. Hoffman a larger and more expensive audience since he didn't take good care of the one he had. >Independent History & Research >Box 849, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 > >To donate by credit card, mail or fax your name and address, VISA or >Master Card account number, expiration date and authorized signature as it >appears on your card, plus the amount you are donating, to the address >above or by > >Fax: 208-777-2612 > >Purchase Hoffman's extensive revisionist books, tapes and newsletters >online at: http://www.hoffman-info.com/bookstore.html > >For a printed catalog of our books and tapes send $3 to the postal >address above. The catalog is for the real stupid people who are unwilling to simply look at the catalog on-line. Please put a nickel into the cup for reading the above advertisement..
At 11:56 AM 01/13/2000 -0800, Hoffman wrote: And now we here from the FBI pimp gallery: >> From: Martin Lindstedt.
> >> >> Another writer, Harold Covington, >Whenever greedy buffoons destroy themselves, they have to blame everyone else for being a fed. Of course, this merely goes to show the character of some "revisionist" holohoaxers -- when in danger or in doubt they lie absent any proof. Hoffman has no evidence that I am a fed except the criticism that I placed onto this merchant paytriot. In any case, I have no defense against Mr. Hoffman's lies. I am not above suspicion, and I would prefer in fact that anyone from the underground who wishes to contact me to not tell me their name and to use an anonymous Internet e-mail account, please, in the interests of internal security. Anyone who is sloppy in the area of internal security will be lectured for their laxness in any case. NOBODY is above suspicion. I quoted Mr. Covington because Mr. Covington wrote about the dangers of becoming a paytriot and expecting money for his duties. Mr. Covington confessed to having these feelings, which he admitted were inappropriate. I neither condemn nor praise Mr. Covington. I do listen to him upon occassion, and he has not wasted my time for a request for money to support his efforts. Mr. Covington has not attacked me, so I am disinclined to attack Mr. Covington. I could whine about being khazar-bit by Mr. Hoffman, but it does not matter. As said before, I do not take Mr. Hoffman's former wire because I didn't care to be begged to support Mr. Hoffman in the style he has grown accustomed to. Mr. Hoffman destroyed his listserver due to his own greedy stupidity. I find it extremely doubtful that any FBI agent made Mr. Hoffman self-destruct. Mr. Hoffman could acted like a White Man ought to act, with his 1993 non-supporters, or his detractors disgusted by his worship of materialism -- but to be charitable, perhaps Mr. Hoffman lacked the racial or inherent abilities to act like a White Gentlemen. Mr. Hoffman should perhaps blame his parents for not giving himself either the racial nor conditioned abilities to simulate being a White Man for very long. Perhaps in every holohoaxer either pro or con there is a khazar just waiting to crawl like a maggot out of the whitewashed shell. In any case, Mr. Hoffman seems determined to burn his bridges to the White Nationalist/Christian Israelite Resistance. Some of us will not be a bit sorry to see him try to get back to being a "professional journalist" 'working' for the New York Times. Perhaps we will even see Mr. Hoffman on the Jewry Springer Show telling about the awful time he had in getting due respect and financial support amongst the primitive rural rednecked shade-tree mechanics and other of us White savages. Having no support amongst the Whites, perhaps Mr. Hoffman will soon become a devotee of jewdeo-churchianity with its full collection plates. Below is one of my collegues from the "FBI pimp gallery" who has been known to work on pickup trucks under the shade of Southern oak trees, the incomparable James Floyd, gut-writer extraordinnare. --Martin Lindstedt Resistance Political Front P.S. You can continue to destroy your position or you can choose to behave yourself before you have absolutely no support in the Resistance. You have already alienated with your foolish arrogance and greed quite a few people who have no allegiance to or respect for you. If you keep this up, pretty soon you will be limited to your seven supporters and that will be it. You would do well to apologize to your former listserver membership that you insulted. -M.L. ================================ At 07:02 AM 01/12/2000 -0600, you wrote: You know Martin, I have believed for a long time that Hoffman is nothing but a money patriot. As long as the money comes in he will be o-so-patriotic, but when it stops he reverts to what he has just done, and whimpers that if people don't send him any money that he will just have to quit. This makes me mad because I have written books and have sent them out over the internet for free and never wimper just like you do also. Sure I put up an add once in a while, as I would like to make a little money for books that I "Print" up, but not for what I post on the Internet. It is like many of the so-called patriots on shortwave radio. They will shout to the four winds how that if the federals ever come after their guns they will have to pry them from their cold dead fingers. But I bet you that most would throw their guns in the yard and beg for forgiveness if the agents came to their house. Sheesh.
Back to Patrick Henry On-Line
Back to The Thought 4 The Day
Bacl to A Resistance Rogues' Gallery